Talk:Libertarianism in the United States

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Libertarianism in the United States article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 6 months

Libertarianism Top‑importance

	Libertarianism portal Libertarianism in the United States is within the scope of WikiProject Libertarianism, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Libertarianism and related subjects in the Wikipedia. Template Usage • Change Patrol • Articles Requested • Become a Member • Project Talk LibertarianismWikipedia:WikiProject LibertarianismTemplate:WikiProject LibertarianismLibertarianism articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: American High‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: History Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. history (assessed as Low-importance).

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Social and political Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Social and political philosophy

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Human rights Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by when more than 3 sections are present.

Mistyped, purposefully misleading or victim of vandalism?

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

"Libertarianism has been described as conservative on economic issues (economic liberalism) and liberal on personal freedom (civil libertarianism)""

Am I wrongly taking issue with things being set up the way they are?

Isn't conservative on economic issues considered fiscal conservatism as per the article on fiscal conservatism?

I'm just wondering if this was accidentally typed wrong, or whether the article is victim of vandalism.

If I'm wrong, I'd love an explanation. Thanks! Lafi90 (talk) 07:26, 30 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

why not Accelerationism?

Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I think a lot of forms of accelerationists can easily fit under the liberatarian category. 210.16.113.141 (talk) 12:28, 10 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

large commented section

Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Davide King, a few years ago you made this edit which used HTML comments to eliminate a very large, referenced section. your comment was "I think it should be better organised", which seems kind of odd. It doesn't look like you ever returned to change the organization; and why comment the seciton out instead of editing it, anyway? I've just removed this because it's been hidden for a long time and is confusing for other editors. (See WP:COMMENT). Did you intend to salvage the material in some way? -- mikeblas (talk) 00:06, 11 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic