Talk:Libya–Sudan relations

Untitled

Would this article be structured better if we added more section headings? RJFJR (talk) 21:47, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Unclear

This article is very unclear. Was Libya ever at war with Sudan? An infobox would make it all more orderly and clear. Can someone with knowledge on this topic pull up one? --Mikrobølgeovn (talk) 08:27, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Requested move 9 January 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved to Libya–Sudan relations per No such user's suggestion, which also fits in with our standard naming practices. Jenks24 (talk) 07:50, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

---

Libyan–Sudanese conflict → Libyan–Sudanese diplomatic conflict – Libya and the Sudan have never been at war. This article describes events in a diplomatic crisis or a diplomatic conflict between the two countries. The current title is therefore inadequate. 191.8.23.47 (talk) 22:03, 9 January 2016 (UTC) Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 07:08, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

• How about Libya–Sudan relations (or Libyan–Sudanese relations) instead? Currently that redirects to Foreign relations of Sudan#Libya, but is marked with {{R with possibilities}}, so the current article would nicely fit there instead. Even this article acknowledges that they were friendly back in the 1970s. No such user (talk) 10:56, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Libya–Sudan relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061028154638/http://www.opencrs.com/rpts/IB93109_20030806.pdf to http://www.opencrs.com/rpts/IB93109_20030806.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:53, 15 May 2017 (UTC)