Talk:Liliana Rodríguez
(Redirected from Talk:Liliana Rodríguez (born 1996))
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Dane in topic Requested move 4 July 2020
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 4 July 2020
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Page moved to Liliana Rodríguez. Disambiguation page moved to Liliana Rodríguez (disambiguation). (closed by non-admin page mover) -- Dane talk 04:34, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
Liliana Rodríguez (born 1996) → Liliana Rodríguez (footballer) – Occupation is above year of birth.--MonFrontieres (talk) 20:58, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
- Support Liliana Rodríguez (born 1996) → Liliana Rodríguez since Liliana Rodríguez is currently a redlink and Liliana Rodriguez redirects to Argentine tango#Salon tango where a dancing family named Rodríguez, one of whom bears the name Liliana, receives a one-line mention. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 23:56, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
- Support this suggestion.--Ortizesp (talk) 16:28, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 10:03, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- Support move to Liliana Rodríguez per @Roman Spinner:, and suggest the redirect is re-targeted. But nominator is correct, we use profession rather than birth details. GiantSnowman 10:05, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- Support move to (footballer) but Oppose move to primary topic as the Mexican football stub is a nonentity, es:Liliana Rodríguez is much better known and has the main page at es.wp. In ictu oculi (talk) 17:57, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- The redlink, not surprisingly, was leading from soaps with the Venezuelan actress/singer who is daughter of famous-in-Venezuela parents. Converted to hndab, but if @GiantSnowman: you judge that the Mexican football stub is a primary then feel free to move the dab out. In ictu oculi (talk) 18:08, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- Support Liliana Rodríguez. She's the only one with an article as yet. If anyone bothers to create an article for any of the others, then Liliana Rodríguez (footballer). -- Necrothesp (talk) 23:12, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- Creating stubs doesn't influence titling. Why should someone create a stub? What difference does it make? In ictu oculi (talk) 10:18, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- Of course it does. If we only have an article on one of them then that article takes the title without disambiguation. That has always been how Wikipedia works and I fail to see the value in changing it now. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:08, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
- Creating stubs doesn't influence titling. Why should someone create a stub? What difference does it make? In ictu oculi (talk) 10:18, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
@Dane: Dane, I think this is a controversial non-admin close. The footballer stub clearly fails WP:PRIMARYTOPIC but has now been moved to a primary topic. In ictu oculi (talk) 19:34, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
- @In ictu oculi: Thanks for bringing this up. I reviewed this again and I believe my close was appropriate. I saw consensus to title the page as I did when closed and with the appropriate hatnote/disambiguation. As for the primary topic, the discussion did not support that this was not the primary topic for the title. I welcome you to file a move review if you still believe it was inappropriate so that further review can be done and your concerns addressed. Thanks! -- Dane talk 19:55, 15 July 2020 (UTC)