Talk:Liliana Rodríguez

(Redirected from Talk:Liliana Rodríguez (born 1996))
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Dane in topic Requested move 4 July 2020

Requested move 4 July 2020

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Page moved to Liliana Rodríguez. Disambiguation page moved to Liliana Rodríguez (disambiguation). (closed by non-admin page mover) -- Dane talk 04:34, 15 July 2020 (UTC)Reply



Liliana Rodríguez (born 1996)Liliana Rodríguez (footballer) – Occupation is above year of birth.--MonFrontieres (talk) 20:58, 4 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 10:03, 5 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
The redlink, not surprisingly, was leading from soaps with the Venezuelan actress/singer who is daughter of famous-in-Venezuela parents. Converted to hndab, but if @GiantSnowman: you judge that the Mexican football stub is a primary then feel free to move the dab out. In ictu oculi (talk) 18:08, 6 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Creating stubs doesn't influence titling. Why should someone create a stub? What difference does it make? In ictu oculi (talk) 10:18, 11 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Of course it does. If we only have an article on one of them then that article takes the title without disambiguation. That has always been how Wikipedia works and I fail to see the value in changing it now. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:08, 13 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

@Dane: Dane, I think this is a controversial non-admin close. The footballer stub clearly fails WP:PRIMARYTOPIC but has now been moved to a primary topic. In ictu oculi (talk) 19:34, 15 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

@In ictu oculi: Thanks for bringing this up. I reviewed this again and I believe my close was appropriate. I saw consensus to title the page as I did when closed and with the appropriate hatnote/disambiguation. As for the primary topic, the discussion did not support that this was not the primary topic for the title. I welcome you to file a move review if you still believe it was inappropriate so that further review can be done and your concerns addressed. Thanks! -- Dane talk 19:55, 15 July 2020 (UTC)Reply