This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Talk:Lincolnshire Limestone Formation is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lincolnshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lincolnshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LincolnshireWikipedia:WikiProject LincolnshireTemplate:WikiProject LincolnshireLincolnshire articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion
The referenced regional memoir (p82) describes the greatest thickness (132ft/40.2m) as being achieved 'at Boothby Pagnell, southeast of Grantham'- the 4 fig OS grid ref for that locality is in fact SK 9730, but not quoted in the ref. cheers Geopersona (talk) 06:33, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Geopersona: Thanks. I had earlier rewritten that part anyway. I introduced an available, citable source, although it lacked the replacement detail about location. Besides, the use of grid references within the body of WP articles is most unconventional; placenames seen to be the norm. Should we re-introduce the location, based on your quotation above? Feline Hymnic (talk) 11:28, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Yes, I think we could add the name of the locality since it's in the source. Some editors do like grid refs - I'd use them sparingly in the body text myself and they'not warranted here. cheers Geopersona (talk) 12:02, 17 October 2023 (UTC)Reply