Talk:Line 2 (Sistema de Tren Eléctrico Urbano)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• SITEUR L1 Juárez.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:22, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Requested move 3 October 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved to Line 2 (Sistema de Tren Eléctrico Urbano) per WP:NOTCURRENTTITLE. Weighing in all the options in this RM and in the discussions for line 1 and line 3, this format seems to be the most appropriate one. (closed by non-admin page mover) — MaterialWorks 15:00, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

---

Line 2 of the Guadalajara urban rail system → Line 2, Guadalajara Urban Electric Train System – Clarity NorthWestPianoShrimp319 (talk) 11:32, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

• Move to Sistema de Tren Eléctrico Urbano (Line 2). The name of the article on the system is Sistema de Tren Eléctrico Urbano. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:04, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

  Ought the article to be called that? English may for purposes of clarity be better, Although there may be policy stating otherwise.

  But your proposed title looks better to me than the one the article had originally, so I approve of it. NorthWestPianoShrimp319 (talk) 08:21, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

  The policy is WP:COMMONNAME. Unless there's an established and commonly used name in English then we use the original Spanish. -- Necrothesp (talk) 08:44, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

  I agree with the new name based on the main article's title. Indeed the original title is not very clear, it probably is also grammatically incorrect.

  I find it a little cumbersome to name the article as a literal translation of Sistema de Tren Eléctrico Urbano (Urban Electric Train System), because the specific combination of those words isn't very common in English.

  By the way, I assume that all other lines' articles (1, 2, 3, 4) will be renamed in this same format, right? SistemaRayoXP (talk) 20:38, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

  I would hope so NorthWestPianoShrimp319 (talk) 02:00, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

• Move to Line 2 (Guadalajara urban rail system) per WP:CONSISTENT. See Line 2 for how many articles are in this format. S5A-0043^Talk 11:56, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
  • That's fine, but why would we use an English term for the system when the article on the Sistema de Tren Eléctrico Urbano itself does not? -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:21, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

    I only have opinions for the "Line X (system name)" formatting only. I don't exactly have opinions on what (system name) yall wanna use, just that I copy pasted the Guadalajara... from the original title into the (system name). This applies for the other 3 articles of this system as well. S5A-0043^Talk 23:42, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

  I like the format but I also agree with @Necrothesp. Line X (Sistema de Tren Eléctrico Urbano) seems adequate to me. SistemaRayoXP (talk) 04:29, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.