Talk:Line of Contact

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles

Military history: World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	World War II task force

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Removed unsourced, POV material

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I cut three sentences that were extremely POV, and apparently original research, too. I see this page had been tagged in the past, but no discussion happened here. I couldn't see any way to salvage this chunk. "What this meant" goes far beyond an unsourced description of some Germans' alleged reactions to different varieties of Soviet troops. If we want to cover such issues, I think we'll need sources, and encyclopedic writing. Thanks. Ale And Quail (talk) 00:55, 18 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Possible NPOV issue

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I have tagged the sentence "Austria managed to stay free of Soviet domination, whereas Czechoslovakia did not." as possibly non-neutral. I am not sure how to resolve the problem, but I don't think that "managed to stay free of Soviet domination" is neutral wording. Please can someone correct this if possible? Thanks, DesertPipeline (talk) 22:57, 28 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

I agree. Czechoslovakia had a popular vote to determine its communist future. Soviet domination is not only non-neutral its also wrong. F.Alexsandr (talk) 14:50, 19 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Really? Czechoslovakia chose to be communist? I guess they changed their minds by 1968, eh? Instead of pro-Soviet revisionism, we should note that multiple future Warsaw pact countries did not want to be under the Soviet yoke, and Soviet authorities in no way allowed free choice - if they had, there would have been no Warsaw pact. Lets get real on this please Rockford1963 (talk) 05:23, 20 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic