Talk:Lions (United Rugby Championship)

Article title

The Cats and other South African Super 14 teams are franchises, not club. The article's title should be changed. Should it be changed to Cats (Super rugby franchise) like the New Zealand Super 14 teams or Cats (rugby union) like Welsh side Ospreys?

Eastpaw 9.35, 10 July 2006 (UTC+8)

Lions?

Why did they actually change their name? What was the reason given?

• According to the Golden Lions, they conducted "in-depth market research". In other words, it was a branding exercise. Here's my take on the rationale: Before 2005, the two main unions connected with the franchise were the Golden Lions and Free State Cheetahs. The Cats roster drew heavily from both unions, and they split their home games between Johannesburg and Bloemfontein. When the latter team became the core of the new Vodacom Cheetahs franchise, the main reason for using the "Cats" name disappeared. All home games are now in Jo'burg, and a large majority of the players on the Super Rugby side are now drawn from the Golden Lions (although the two other unions associated with the Super Rugby side have feline nicknames, namely Leopards and Pumas). — Dale Arnett 01:40, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Jersey

I'm pretty sure the Lions away jersey is red- could someone change this in the image? ronan.evans 13:02, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Cats Rugby.jpeg

Image:Cats Rugby.jpeg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:45, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Crusaders (rugby) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 06:30, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved to Lions (Super Rugby). Jenks24 (talk) 07:46, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

---

Lions (rugby union) → Lions (Super rugby franchise) – To anyone in the Northern Hemisphere, Lions (rugby union) means British and Irish Lions. There are also articles at Golden Lions and Rugby Lions. The 2011 move discussion that put the Super rugby franchise to that title took no account of any of these. This page should therefore be moved. I suggest moving back to the former title Lions (Super rugby franchise) which still has lots of inlinks, but some other non-ambiguous title may be preferred for some other reason. Lions (rugby union) should in any case be either a dab or a {{R from incomplete disambiguation}} to Lion (disambiguation)#Sports. jnestorius^(talk) 23:07, 6 August 2012 (UTC) jnestorius^(talk) 23:07, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

• Support. Per nom. Yes, Lions (in rugby) to those of us outside South Africa means British (and Irish) Lions, not some new-fangled "franchise". -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:34, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

• Support. I agree, this should be a disambiguation page. My personal preference would be to move this page to Lions (Super Rugby) or Lions (Super Rugby team) though, rather than Lions (Super rugby franchise). TheMightyPeanut (talk) 16:16, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

• Support renaming this article to Lions (Super Rugby) and turning this page into a disambiguation page pointing to the various Lions rugby teams. Greenman (talk) 17:40, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Discussion

Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.