Wikipedia

Talk:List of aviation accidents and incidents in the war in Afghanistan

(Redirected from Talk:List of Coalition aircraft losses in Afghanistan)
Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page

untitled

edit
Latest comment: 17 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

A MI-26 on charter for Dyncorp in Afghanistan crashed last december. NATO held a ceremony for the deceased crew : http://www2.hq.nato.int/ISAF/update/Press_Releases/newsrelease/2006/pr061210-349.htm

Shouldn't this crash be considered a "coalition" loss? Comments anyone? Hudicourt 23:43, 7 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

There was also an AN-32 crash with US Drug agents on board. Does that count ? Hudicourt 23:45, 7 March 2007 (UTC)Reply


I would consider both to be worth of mention, perhaps following the Iraq example and making a section at the bottom of the article for Privately-Contracted Aircrash Losses or something along that vein. Sherurcij (Speaker for the Dead) 00:33, 8 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

I moved a previously posted MI-8 crash to the "contract aircraft losses section since it was not a military helicopter, even if some Dutch military personnel died on board

Censorship?

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Why did the list stop for 2008 entirely? There was a US spec-ops helicopter crash on 25th January 2008 with at least one KIA. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.83.2.98 (talk) 22:29, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I searched the usual sources and find no trace of the incident you refer to.Hudicourt (talk) 02:40, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

UAVs?

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

What about UAV losses? Are they not not aircraft? Hudicourt (talk) 20:00, 15 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

some info here http://edition.cnn.com/2010/TECH/web/07/27/afghanistan.wikilinks.drones/index.html?iref=allsearch#fbid=tmqyIWnC3DE

http://edition.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/asiapcf/07/28/afghanistan.drone.down/index.html?iref=allsearch#fbid=tmqyIWnC3DE --93.137.31.19 (talk) 16:37, 28 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Ismail

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Qari Ismail is accused of downing a Chinook in June 2006, killing as many as 16 persons aboard - either this list is missing a major downing, or somebody fucked up. Sherurcij (speaker for the dead) 20:40, 13 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

It's a mistake, probably by whatever news source you got the info from. There was a Chinook downed in June 2005, killing 16. PBP (talk) 22:36, 13 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
Aha, thanks for that - I checked adjacent months thinking perhaps it had occurred at the end of a month and was reported the next - but didn't think to check year discrepencies. Much thanks. Sherurcij (speaker for the dead) 22:46, 13 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Notability missing in lead paragraph

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago8 comments2 people in discussion

I see that editors have expended a lot of time on this list. Please could someone explain why it is notable and how it qualifies under Wikipedia's notability guidelines? Wikipedia:Notability (events) says: Many events receive coverage in the news and yet are not of historic or lasting importance. The Manual of Style and Wikipedia:Lists suggest that even lists should have a lead section that explains their notability. Thanks. --Bejnar (talk) 15:34, 15 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

What I see in the extensive footnotes are citation to primary news sources, no secondary sources. --Bejnar (talk) 15:40, 15 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
News agencies and journalists are not directly involved in the incidents, so they are secondary sources and not primary sources. -- Magioladitis (talk) 16:36, 15 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
I beg to differ. News is generally regarded as a primary source, as it is very close to an event, often accounts written by people who are directly involved.Wikipedia:No original research#Primary, secondary and tertiary sources Notice the word "often". Secondary sources write about primary sources, often making analytic or evaluative claims about them.Wikipedia:No original research#Primary, secondary and tertiary sources Some reports in newspapers are analytical and look at more than just reporting an incident, and are secondary sources. However, those that I have looked at as substantiating this article were all mere reportage. --Bejnar (talk) 15:31, 16 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
See also, Primary sources are documents or people very close to the situation you are writing about. An eyewitness account of a traffic accident published in a newspaper is a primary source. from Wikipedia:Attribution/FAQ#Types of source material, not a guideline, but an essay. --Bejnar (talk) 15:39, 16 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
We are not talking about eye-witnesses here. Most articles are based on official press releases or information given by the US Army. -- Magioladitis (talk) 16:18, 16 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
You make my point: no analysis, no integration, no fact checking, just a report. --Bejnar (talk) 23:27, 16 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
I think we disagree. Media reports can't be considered as primary sources unless the just contain statements of eye-witnesses. Since we were officially confirmed, published and not doubted they form third party sources. -- Magioladitis (talk) 23:45, 16 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.isaf.nato.int/article/isaf-releases/isaf-helicopter-makes-emergency-landing-in-kunar-province.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. MkativerataCCI (talk) 20:54, 8 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

FYI: Recent CH-53 crash around midnight a day or so ago (Jan 18 2011 I believe)

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I just heard it on Fox News. They said a CH-53 crashed in Afghanistan and they do not know the cause yet. 7 were reported dead. Maybe something to keep an eye on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.73.114.111 (talk) 00:46, 20 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

February 6: a US Army AH-64 Apache helicopter crashed with no casualties. Clearly not "Showboating"

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

I have not been active in aviation since 1992, however, this video appears to be looked at from the wrong viewpoint and premature.

the citation ends with --- The video clearly shows an hazardous air manouver for entertainment reasons as the cause of the crash.[2][3]

I believe that is inccorect and possibly the wrong foot to start on. Unfortunately there are numerous classic jokes about it online. I believe this one is an experienced instructor pilot trying to figure out an approach to target in the mountains. Something the Army has never done. The helicopter is approaching a high mountain pinnicle a very difficult and dangerous target to attack. The helicopter is approaching Nape of The Earth at the Army military outpost. The helicopter is nowhere near the village. In the video the village is clearly three miles away on another mountain top. I can not fathom how anybody can miss that obvious fact.

The village is three miles away on another mountain top!!!! 

 Then if you look carefully at the video the first 4-8 seconds the appache approaches very low (classic Nape of the Earth), and it is an
approach to a target.  One of the military personnel is holding a large 4 foot square yellow target with a black diaganol x.  that is a
helicopter trainging target.

in the actual impact sequence you can see the pilot is leveling just before impact trying to save the mission first. then realizing it will not work and the helicopter is bouncing up and he is trying to fly it, however he does not have enough collective pitch to fly. The helicopter starts decending towards 4 or 5 village people who are returning and the pilot pulls maximum collective pitch all the way up to the stops. Tearing the guts out of the engine and transmission. However it was a split second decision by the pilot. It does appear to be demonstrating brilliant instinct to save the people. He was flying an accident in progress away from the people at that point. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.224.108.29 (talk) 14:51, 25 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

I believe that appache accident video is once in 30 or 40 years classic test pilot aviation safety no-no video. please send that pilot back up. I would never have been that good. I did giggle about it. Sorry - test pilot that is the job it is yours thank-God, not mine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.224.108.29 (talk) 15:27, 25 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

(This is not a reply to the person above)

How is it that the manouver supposedly was for "for entertainment reasons"? Sources on this? I guess not. Who wrote that and why? That statement is false, and it should be removed.

To me it seems that something went wrong on the way up, eg engine failure. However the pilot wasn't high enough to autorotate. Simple as that. People shouldn't try to judge stuff they don't understand.

--Dsandlund (talk) 11:26, 28 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

It's been almost a week and no comment on the above, so I'm editing the article.
--Dsandlund (talk) 10:29, 4 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

edit
Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.nowpublic.com/world/u-s-black-hawk-helicopters-has-ben-crashed-afghanistan
    Triggered by \bnowpublic\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 18:04, 8 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 17:34, 2 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on List of aviation accidents and incidents in the war in Afghanistan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:59, 15 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on List of aviation accidents and incidents in the war in Afghanistan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:04, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of aviation accidents and incidents in the war in Afghanistan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:58, 20 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on List of aviation accidents and incidents in the war in Afghanistan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:10, 18 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on List of aviation accidents and incidents in the war in Afghanistan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:59, 28 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_aviation_accidents_and_incidents_in_the_war_in_Afghanistan&oldid=1195316765"