Talk:List of justices of the Supreme Court of the United States by seat
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Could somebody explain the significance of this?
editCould somebody explain the significance of this article and the 'seats' that justices sit in? It has been my thought that justices served together as a 'body' / as one unit, and did not specifically fill one seat or another. For example, if two associate justices retired at the same time, the president would not need (nor even could he) designate which nominee was specifically replacing which retiring justice. Is that not true? Rodchen (talk) 05:01, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Just to expand this question. I notice [1] specifically DOES NOT communicate the idea of 'seats' on the Supreme Court. The only 'seat' that there is the Chief Justice seat. The Associate Justices, so to speak, do not each have a seat but share a bench that they all sit at. The only other sense that there are seats are in terms of 'seniority'. Rodchen (talk) 05:10, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Please provide references to the existance of 'seats' on the Supreme Court. Rodchen (talk) 08:58, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on List of Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States by seat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040202052929/http://oyez.itcs.northwestern.edu/oyez/frontpage to http://oyez.itcs.northwestern.edu/oyez/frontpage
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050920065117/http://www.michaelariens.com/ConLaw/justices/list.htm to http://www.michaelariens.com/ConLaw/justices/list.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:57, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Redirect
editI have redirected this list article to List of justices of the Supreme Court of the United States as that article's primary table has a column showing justices to justice succession as well as a graphical timeline depicting the progression of the justices (justices to justice succession). Cheers. Drdpw (talk) 02:19, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
Consensus on a timeline?
editHere is a timeline I would like to add to this article:
LegoK9 (talk) 21:01, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- There is a much cleaner and easier-to-read timeline at List of justices of the Supreme Court of the United States: See the section "Timeline of justices". It would probably be more appropriate here than in that article; that article is not "by seat" as this one is, and the timeline is specifically designed to show seat. Alternatively, if the desire is to have it in both articles, it could be made into a template and transcluded. TJRC (talk) 22:12, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- This page might be a more appropriate place for the graphical TL. At one time it had a separate page, but was redirected to the list article page, so moving it would need a consensus to do so. (Regarding your last point, I see no reason for it to be on both pages.) Drdpw (talk) 02:26, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
- I have some general issues with the above graphical TL template, which I've gone into on the List of justices of the Supreme Court of the United States talk page. Regarding this page specifically, most of the information provided in that TL goes beyond the scope of this page, and that which is pertinent simply restates in rows the names of justices, which the succession/"seat" columns do already, and do in a more practical, informative, and legible fashion. Drdpw (talk) 02:26, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
- I think that a graph would be a good addition to the article, but only if it's legible. It will be very difficult to make names of justices legible when creating a graph for a period of over 230 years, so maybe it could be broken up into different graphs by era (say, 1789 to 1869, 1869 to 1953, and 1953 to present). AuH2ORepublican (talk) 18:03, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
- I'm not a fan of breaking TL's up by random years or nebulous eras. List of justices of the Supreme Court of the United States by court composition separates justices and graphs by the tenure of each chief justice, which is a firm and logical start/end. This article is about succession/"seats", so that would be the most logical way to divide up the justices, which is what the column tables do currently. The justices in the graphical TL at List of justices of the Supreme Court of the United States#Timeline of justices are divided into three nearly equal columns, somewhat random and nebulous, but looks logical. It does have the width problem associated with having one graph to cover 232 years and 115 justices. Drdpw (talk) 18:42, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
- Why cannot this timeline work on this page? I just want to know. Thank You!
- I'm not a fan of breaking TL's up by random years or nebulous eras. List of justices of the Supreme Court of the United States by court composition separates justices and graphs by the tenure of each chief justice, which is a firm and logical start/end. This article is about succession/"seats", so that would be the most logical way to divide up the justices, which is what the column tables do currently. The justices in the graphical TL at List of justices of the Supreme Court of the United States#Timeline of justices are divided into three nearly equal columns, somewhat random and nebulous, but looks logical. It does have the width problem associated with having one graph to cover 232 years and 115 justices. Drdpw (talk) 18:42, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Traditions of each Seat?
editIn the Senatorial courtesy article it is mentioned that one seat was held by New York justices since the Jefferson administration. There also used to be a longstanding tradition of a "jewish seat" in the court. I assume other seats may have similar traditions. This seems like the best place to include that kind of trivia. jonas (talk) 12:57, 25 December 2021 (UTC)