Talk:Polish resistance

Page layout

IMHO this layout is much more useful and user friendly ... easier to find what you want by being in list form. Whereas this layout surely hides the minor articles in the jumble on each line. I would be interested to hear a counter view ... or maybe support for mine. Abtract (talk) 18:45, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

I've asked for comments at WP:PWNB.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 19:19, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Good idea. Abtract (talk) 19:30, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

• First one - clarity. Space Cadet (talk) 19:58, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
• First one is clearer, I agree. Nihil novi (talk) 21:37, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
• First one - transparency. Squash Racket (talk) 12:11, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
• Second one - I find it more clear, but I will certainly not revert back to it if the community disagrees.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 16:40, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

I think your problem is that you have to scroll down the screen to be able view the whole list. Maybe if you choose the first version and use two columns at the second section, this can be solved. Squash Racket (talk) 15:23, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

• First one - much easier to find what you want imho. Abtract (talk) 16:43, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

• Consensus seems to have been reached so I have made the change, but someone might like to take up the two column idea above. Abtract (talk) 16:48, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Modern resistance

I moved the following from article, as it sounds dubious: "1989-present prediod": Project of newcreation of the Republic of Central Lithuania, or creation of the Republic of North Poland with Wilno as capital city (ref: Wilno to wciąż polskie miasto). I doubt this is a notable organization / movement. It seems even less notable then RAŚ... --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 19:03, 15 February 2009 (UTC)