Talk:List of national parks of the United States by elevation
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 16 April 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from List of U.S. National Parks by elevation to List of national parks of the United States by elevation. The result of the discussion was moved. |
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of U.S. National Parks by elevation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.lostphotograph.co.uk/rainbow_point.jpg - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080422010901/http://www.climb.mountains.com/Project_Island_files/US_National_Parks_Elev.htm to http://www.climb.mountains.com/Project_Island_files/US_National_Parks_Elev.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:24, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
Requested move 16 April 2022
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) NW1223<Howl at me•My hunts> 16:46, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
List of U.S. National Parks by elevation → List of national parks of the United States by elevation – or List of U.S. national parks by elevation. For consistency with List of national parks of the United States and List of national monuments of the United States. "U.S. National Parks" is not a proper name in the grammatical sense. — BarrelProof (talk) 15:59, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
- Support: I've made that correction many times. The National Park Service is the proper name of an organization that manages national parks (not a proper noun, hence lower case). SchreiberBike | ⌨ 16:21, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
- Support per SchreiberBike. Yes, these national parks are run by the U.S. National Park Service, but when speaking about a federal park, its just national park. cookie monster 755 16:57, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
- Question: Which of my two suggested titles is better? The first one is consistent with the other similarly titled article, while the second one is more concise and thus could be considered preferred by WP:SHORTFORM. I think I lean toward the first one, based on the idea that, as MOS:US says, "U.S. or US may be too informal, especially at the first mention". — BarrelProof (talk) 17:34, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- The second one sounds better, but List of national parks of the United States already exists and the first fits well with that. Changing List of national parks of the United States to List of U.S. national parks is possible, but sounds a bit too informal. I guess I prefer the first then, but either would work. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 20:37, 19 April 2022 (UTC)