This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
In general Wikipedia is believed, supposed to not include original research. But list-articles such as this one obviously create new knowledge. There have been published attempts to compile lists on this topic, but none that comes close to this compendium, as far as I know. --Doncram (talk) 16:27, 28 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
User:KJP1, thanks! I was in fact dimly recalling that article, which I read with interest a long time ago, and its great picture, but could not find it. It's a fortified bridge, and signficant enclosed defensive works on a bridge should qualify it for this list-article IMO. I do see the enclosed space has had other uses, too. Other military/fortified bridges should perhaps be included, such as an American bridge during the American Civil War which had raised blockhouses; I saw a photo of it in Commons but it lacked identification of its location. Again, thanks for that! --Doncram (talk) 01:29, 2 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
User:MB, in this edit, tagged the article for {{lede rewrite}} with suggestion there should be no questions. Thanks, I don't mind the tagging, though I have since removed the tag after rewording to avoid explicit questions. Further feedback welcomed. It is an issue, how to introduce/describe a list-article like this which in fact is an original compendium increasing world knowledge on a topic, but certainly incomplete and with many outstanding questions at least implied. --Doncram (talk) 01:22, 2 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
