Talk:List of contemporary Islamic scholars
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 2006-01-06. The result of the discussion was Merge. |
| This article was nominated for deletion on 2006-02-21. The result of the discussion was Transfer to Talk Page. |
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.png)
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Requested move 13 June 2021
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) Red Slash 19:29, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
List of contemporary Muslim scholars of Islam → List of contemporary Islamic scholars – I suggest the page title is changed from 'List of contemporary Muslim scholars of Islam' to 'List of contemporary Islamic scholars'. Islamic scholar is a term in common usage to describe Muslim scholars of Islam, it is more concise and understood also the intro paragraph states that this is a list of Islamic scholars. It's like if you insisted on calling a washing machine a 'machine of washing', it would sound archaic and you would have to add the word 'clothes' to make clear what you were referring to. There is already a lack of consistency in this subject area. The page 'List of female Muslim scholars', doesn't use 'of Islam' in the title, so according to the title they may be scholars of anything, but the intro paragraph says that the list is of female scholars of Islam. The page 'List of Shia Muslim Islamic scholars', used the term Islamic scholars and the word 'Muslim' is also used in the title. It could be made more concise without losing clarity by changing it to 'List of Shia Islamic scholars'. According to WP:CRITERIA page titles should be recognizable, natural, precise, concise and consistent. Amirah talk 10:39, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Support I just formatted this request and I support the rename because "List of contemporary Islamic scholars" is consistent with the policies and it recognizes its subject very well. "Islamic scholars" is a generally used term for those who have/enjoy authoritative status after qualifying from a certain seminary, say Darul Uloom Deoband, and are referred as "aalim", "ulama" (plural), and Islamic scholars in English language. For example see this and this. "Islamic scholars" is best imo. ─ The Aafī (talk) 11:40, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Support - According to the move log of this page, Mosesheron objected to this move because the phrases "Muslim scholars of Islam" and "Islamic scholars" do not refer to the same group of people. Many Islamic scholars do not identify themselves as Muslims. However, this confuses secular Islamic studies scholars with Muslim scholars specializing in the Islamic religious sciences (ulama). In English, the term 'Islamic scholars' normally refers to the latter, and it never refers to the former. Thus, the proposed new name is not ambiguous, and much clearer. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 13:50, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose - Non-Muslim scholars of Islam are also frequently referred to as "Islamic scholars." Here are a few examples:
“Louis Massignon , the outstanding French Islamic scholar , did not become less a Christian than most of his academic contemporaries , on account of his conviction that he owed his faith and….”
-- (The world is a wedding: Explorations in Christian spirituality, Crossroad, A. M Allchin, p.26),“The well known Islamic scholar H. A. R. Gibb begins the text of a lecture on 'The Reaction in the Middle East Against…..”
-- (Militant Islam, Harper, Godfrey H. Jansen , p. 62),“Apart from this initial effort at dialogue, an earlier visit to West Africa in 1952 by the renowned Islamic scholar, J.S. Trimingham, resulted in his publishing a pamphlet titled The Christian Church and Islam in West Africa”
-- (Muslim-Christian dialogue in Nigeria, Daystar Press by Victor Chukwulozie p. 67),“Richard Bulliet, a distinguished Islamic scholar, suggests there is actually one " Islamo - Christian Civilization”
-- (Universal Religions in World History: Buddhism, Christianity, and Islam (Explorations in World History, McGraw-Hill Humanities, Johnson & Johnson p. 213),“Kenneth Cragg , an eminent christian theologian and Islamic scholar has pointed out that early christian missionaries in Arabia have first invented the Arabic script that was used for printing the Quran”
-- (Early Christianity in India: With Parallel Developments in other Parts of Asia, Institute of Asian Studies, p. 54),“As a matter of fact , the Protestant spectrum is even broader as can be perceived through the orientations of five well known Protestant Islamic scholars taken here as models for different sensitivities toward Islam…..”
(Islam and Christianity: Mutual Perceptions Since the Mid-20th Century, Jacques Waardenburg (ed.) Peeters Publishers, p. 89). I do not think the current title is problematic. The propsed one, on the other hand, is. I stand by my earlier reasoning. Mosesheron (talk) 15:11, 13 June 2021 (UTC)- As shown by the examples you cite, 'Islamic scholar' apparently is sometimes used to refer to secular scholars of Islam. However, this is very much a secondary use, as shown, for example, by the majority of results on a Google scholar search for "Islamic scholar" or "Islamic scholars" (compare with "scholars of Islam"). The qualifying word "contemporary" in the title also serves to dispel any potential ambiguity: a list of secular scholars of Islam would not need this qualifier (they are all more or less contemporary), and the fact that we do include it makes it obvious that we are talking about the type of 'Islamic scholar' of which there are also many and more famous historical examples (al-Bukhari, al-Ghazali, Ibn Taymiyya, etc.). ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 16:37, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- You can change the title if you wish. However, since the term "Islamic scholar" is also used in other contexts in the English language, I cannot support the change. Mosesheron (talk) 19:11, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
- As shown by the examples you cite, 'Islamic scholar' apparently is sometimes used to refer to secular scholars of Islam. However, this is very much a secondary use, as shown, for example, by the majority of results on a Google scholar search for "Islamic scholar" or "Islamic scholars" (compare with "scholars of Islam"). The qualifying word "contemporary" in the title also serves to dispel any potential ambiguity: a list of secular scholars of Islam would not need this qualifier (they are all more or less contemporary), and the fact that we do include it makes it obvious that we are talking about the type of 'Islamic scholar' of which there are also many and more famous historical examples (al-Bukhari, al-Ghazali, Ibn Taymiyya, etc.). ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 16:37, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Top slamic scholars
edit. Mufti taqi usmani . Mufti tariq masood . Molana tariq jameel . Mufti menk . 2A02:C7F:9E7A:B200:6CCB:F4FF:FE3F:850F (talk) 15:57, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
"Muslim scholars" listed at Redirects for discussion
edit
The redirect Muslim scholars has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 9 § Muslim scholars until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:47, 9 July 2023 (UTC)