Talk:List of fortifications in Serbia
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Kosovo
editZvečan is part of Kosovo, which declared independence from Serbia. Therefore, I am removing it from the list because it does not belong to Serbia anymore.--Arbër (Let's Talk) 08:04, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
POV
editI have added the POV:KS template because this article lists places in Kosovo with no references to the status of Kosovo. Please clearly mark all places in Kosovo as disputed. thanks,
mike
James Michael DuPont (talk) 19:04, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
Done --WhiteWriter speaks 11:26, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
- {{POV:KS}} I am not finished yet, it has to be added to all Wikiproject:Kosovo i think we need a new {{WP:Republic of Kosovo}} {{WP:RoK}} template. James Michael DuPont (talk) 16:08, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
- That category will not be added, that is violation of NPOV. --WhiteWriter speaks 16:13, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
- Well if not a category, then at least the wikiproject, we need to track this article as containing relevant material that needs further work.
- I am sorry, are you doing this by mistake, or not? Why are you placing this templates on talk page? Also, you are welcome to create articles or fix them, you dont need to push pointless self created templates on talk pages. I dont understand what do you want with this article? --WhiteWriter speaks 16:32, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
- ok what about this template, and I mean it.
- Well if not a category, then at least the wikiproject, we need to track this article as containing relevant material that needs further work.
- That category will not be added, that is violation of NPOV. --WhiteWriter speaks 16:13, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
Deliberate insertion of factual errors
editAntidiskriminator, why have you added things to this list which when you know they are not in Serbia? bobrayner (talk) 00:35, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- No doubt you know that I haven't inserted anything here. No doubt you know that I reverted your bold removal of text which exists in this article for years. No doubt you know that the title of the section you created here violates WP:TALK behavioral guideline. No doubt that you repeat your disruptive tendentious editing because you know that the worst thing that can happen to you is another warning. Bobrayner, your questions to me are never good faith questions aimed to resolve dispute. They are always fallacious disruptive bad faith loaded questions aimed to push your POV and bait other editors to violate wikipedia rules. Please be so kind not to repeat this kind of questions and not to expect that I am going to ever reply to this kind of questions of yours. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 08:11, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- Those fortifications are in Kosovo, not in Serbia. The content you added isn't just unsourced, it also misleads readers.
- You know that. Stop it. bobrayner (talk) 12:37, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- The only factual error here seems a coplete and intentional unability from Bobrayner to understand that Kosovo is not a member of UN, is far from being undisputedly consiedered a country, and that approximatelly half of world countries still regard it as Serbian province. The edit is correct, the places that are in Kosovo are clearly diffirenciated by color. What is disturbing here is the agressive promotion of Kosovo independence by Bobrayner. FkpCascais (talk) 14:42, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- Why are you stalking me? And what does UN membership have to do with it? It's frustrating that you feel your word salad justifies putting unsourced content and factual errors in the article. In reality, Kosovo and Serbia are separate countries; on wikipedia, Kosovo is a province of Serbia, due to your stalking and reverting editors who try to bring wikipedia in line with reality. Of course, this fails policies like WP:NPOV. bobrayner (talk) 14:48, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- I am not stalking you, I have a vast watchlist and whenever I see you and Ad arrguing about the same article I already know what is about.
- Why are you stalking me? And what does UN membership have to do with it? It's frustrating that you feel your word salad justifies putting unsourced content and factual errors in the article. In reality, Kosovo and Serbia are separate countries; on wikipedia, Kosovo is a province of Serbia, due to your stalking and reverting editors who try to bring wikipedia in line with reality. Of course, this fails policies like WP:NPOV. bobrayner (talk) 14:48, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- The only factual error here seems a coplete and intentional unability from Bobrayner to understand that Kosovo is not a member of UN, is far from being undisputedly consiedered a country, and that approximatelly half of world countries still regard it as Serbian province. The edit is correct, the places that are in Kosovo are clearly diffirenciated by color. What is disturbing here is the agressive promotion of Kosovo independence by Bobrayner. FkpCascais (talk) 14:42, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- Bob, honestly, the situation in Kosovo is far from being solved. Personally, I do beleave that sooner or later probably the reality you defend (Kosovo independent nation) will happend. But that is WP:CRYSTALBALL. We still don´t know. Aproximaelly half of world countries recognised it as independent, other half still consider it Serbian province. However, the problem here is you and your editing as Kosovo´s independence is a clearly accepeted fact. Ad edit makes a distinction by color, so it is a neutral stand, much more than yours, as you even fail to recognise the complexitity of the reality (not your reality ;) ~which is to ignore complexity) FkpCascais (talk) 19:02, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:54, 24 December 2022 (UTC)