This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mormonism and the Latter Day Saint movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latter Day Saint movementWikipedia:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementTemplate:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementLatter Day Saint movement articles
This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion articles
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello again, everyone! In the recent past, both ChristensenMJ and myself have removed the link in this article to Silvia H. Allred's Wikipedia article, due to that article having been nominated for deletion, which deletion is almost certain to occur in the near future. Fullrab has unilaterally kept readding the wikilink to Allred's name here, contrary to what was said both times in the reverts of those additions done by ChristensenMJ and myself. Since I want to prevent the start of an edit war here, unless Fullrab is willing to explain the repeat reverts of the removal of the link in question, that user may soon be in violation of the three-revert rule. I have left the link around Allred's name for now to give Fullrab a chance to explain his/her actions in this respect, but wanted to note here that further discussion needs to occur on this due to how close this issue is getting to an edit war, which I personally would prefer to avoid. --Jgstokes (talk) 20:45, 3 August 2019 (UTC)Reply