This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject British and Irish hills, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the hills and mountains of Great Britain and Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British and Irish hillsWikipedia:WikiProject British and Irish hillsTemplate:WikiProject British and Irish hillsBritish and Irish hills articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
There used to be a "List of British Isles mountains by relative height" which was really the P600s. I have updated that article so that it is properly referencing a high-quality secondary source of P600s in the British Isles (some editors had made their own edits to names and heights which destroyed the integrity of the P600 data).
This new article expands the new P600 article with a much longer list, going down to 150m in prominence (which are all Marilyns), so that the rankings across the Britsh Isles can be seen. Importantly, the data is sourced from the DoBIH (which operates under a CC-BY-3.0 Unported licence), so it is important that NOBODY mess with these figures; I have not manipulated or amended DoBIH's data in any way except to only take out the columns shown (which are the only DoBIH columns on height and prominence). If you have a problem with a name or figure etc., note it (and e-mail the DoBIH team), but don't change the article data as otherwise the sourcing will become compromised and, like the old P600 article, of no real use to anybody. Britishfinance (talk) 11:48, 8 October 2018 (UTC)Reply