Pope's image

edit

John Paul II was the first and, to this day, the only Pope to visit Armenia, the first country to recognize Christianity as state religion in 301. Don't you think that's quite of a historic event? His visit to Tsitsernakaberd had a great reaction around the world. I think after all this, the image deserves to be there, first because it is the subject of a controversy, second it depicts a signification historic event. --Երևանցի talk 02:17, 6 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

The image is not the subject of controversy. Depicting a significant historical event is not an adequate justification for inserting a nonfree image. What does the image convey that the text cannot? Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 02:23, 6 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
It shows the historical visit of a notable religious figure and the act which burst controversy. Also, it gives the reader idea what kind of a ceremony is usually held at the memorial.--Երևանցի talk 02:31, 6 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
In other words, nothing beyond what is conveyed by the text. Obvious NFCC failure. None of what you say relates to our actual NFCC requirements. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 06:22, 6 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
And can you please explain how Jennifer Lopez's photo on thr cover of People in Public image section pass the NFCC requirements?--Երևանցի talk 16:39, 6 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
It's another obvious NFCC failure, it's been in the article about a minute and a half, and you should have removed it yourself rather than trying to use it to justify another violation! Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 19:19, 6 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
I'm not justifying anything. I just wanna clarify in what cases non free images can be used. I don't seem to get the idea. Almost all non-free images I've seen are much useless that this image of John Paul II. Can we engage more people in this? --Երևանցի talk 19:33, 6 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Osman baydemir

edit

When he visited there in September 2014, Osman Baydemir wasn't mayor of Diyarbakır Metropolitan Municipality.So, he can not take place there!

Not a valid excuse. I am giving you a final warning. Check your own talk page. --92slim (talk) 14:45, 15 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Notability???

edit

Can someone please explain how this list is notable? This strikes me as failing WP:NOT. That a particular person visited can be verified with secondary sources, but the subject as whole does not appear to be notable. The monument, yeah, but people visiting this monument as a notable subject itself? I'm sorry, I'm not seeing it. --Hammersoft (talk) 16:33, 2 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on List of visitors to Tsitsernakaberd. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:27, 2 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of visitors to Tsitsernakaberd. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:22, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:46, 9 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:53, 18 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:53, 17 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:48, 30 June 2021 (UTC)Reply