This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This alphabetical index of Wikipedia articles falls within the scope of the WikiProject Indexes. This is a collaborative effort to create, maintain, and improve alphabetical indexes on Wikipedia.IndexesWikipedia:WikiProject IndexesTemplate:WikiProject IndexesIndexes articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Role-playing games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of role-playing games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Role-playing gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Role-playing gamesTemplate:WikiProject Role-playing gamesrole-playing game articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I propose the following notability guidelines for inclusion in this list: the artist must be notable enough to either have a separate wikipedia entry OR must have contributed to a notable game as evidenced by a reference/citation of some sort. If neither the game nor the artist already has a wikipedia page, please add a citation to a reliable, third party (in other words, not the artist or the game's website) source to show that this is a notable artist. The artist doesn't have to be mentioned in the reference source, just the game. It is acceptable to use the game and/or artist's website to "prove" that they worked on that particular product, but not to show notability. All I'm asking is that you make some attempt to show that the person/collective is notable. If the artist or the game they worked on have a separate article, then I think we're safe. I hope this makes sense, if not or if you disagree, please let me know. Vampyrecat (talk) 01:38, 1 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
