Talk:List of armored fighting vehicles of the Soviet Union

"Obyekt 279" and other prototype tanks?

Should they be listed? After all, the 279 was built. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.57.59.99 (talk) 23:01, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

I think all experimentals should be added under their own section. Even those that never reached the prototype stage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.46.148.153 (talk) 09:57, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Armata

New Armata is finished and should be added https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armata_Universal_Combat_Platform — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.47.107.243 (talk) 23:57, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Requested move 5 November 2020

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move, after much-extended time for discussion. BD2412 T 00:13, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

List of tanks of the Soviet Union → ? – Proposed names:

• List of tracked armoured fighting vehicles of the Soviet Union
• List of armoured fighting vehicles of the Soviet Union

Much of this list consists of vehicles that are not tanks by even the most liberal interpretation of the term: infantry fighting vehicles, self-propelled artillery pieces, anti-tank guns, and air-defence weapons. The proposed titles fairly accurately encompass most of what is listed here. Headings could also be retitled without guilt (e.g., BMP-2 is not an “amphibious light tank”). Renaming is better than undoing all of the work of compiling this large list. After this rename, I presume there would be some minor inflation including armoured personnel carriers, command, combat engineering, and miscellaneous carriers, or a bigger addition including wheeled vehicles.  —Michael Z. 17:50, 5 November 2020 (UTC) —Relisting. BegbertBiggs (talk) 00:32, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

• Weak oppose. Precision is important, but Armoured fighting vehicle is one of those terms that people deep in the weeds of military equipment use or know about to create a catch-all for tracked anti-air guns and the like, but under "liberal interpretationos of the term", sure a ZSU-37 is a tank (despite technically being a self-propelled anti-aircraft weapon or the like). At least if you show that picture to a random person they'd be willing to call it a tank. If the article is moved, skip "tracked" IMO even if the list is inflated, but I'd rather just clarify the lede that it includes tanks and tank-ish close relatives. SnowFire (talk) 18:19, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

  Well, a whale might look like a fish, but an encyclopedia shouldn’t call it that to make it easier for readers to learn about them. If we need to make accommodations for unfamiliar terminology, see also the titles of other lists of AFVs. At least the old name can remain redirected to the correct one, which should also help present it in web searches, etc. —Michael Z. 20:27, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

• Oppose per WP:RECOGNIZABILITY, WP:NATURALNESS, and WP:CONCISENESS. Readers won't search for "armored fighting vehicle"; they'll search for "tank". If the distinction's important, describe it in the prose, but don't make readers get a milhist degree just to find the article. Whatever the difference, it doesn't justify adding three whole words of jargon to the title. — Wug·a·po·des​ 03:51, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

  Redirects and descriptions in the list will capture those search-results link without implying that an incorrect name is correct. And it is contrary to WP:CONSISTENCY, unless you’re suggesting we also rename armoured fighting vehicle and the many lists of armoured fighting vehicles. —Michael Z. 14:24, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

• Comment in any case "of the Soviet Union" doesn't cover the inclusion of tanks (or "armored vehicles") in the Russian empire, modern-day Russia etc. that are present in this article. Unless I'm missing something. Aza24 (talk) 06:55, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

  Agreed, although we can see them as related content (many articles have “Background” and “Aftermath” sections), but suggestions for improvement are welcome. WP:BE BOLD. —Michael Z. 14:24, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

• What's the standard for other countries? I'm not at all comfortable with an expansive definition of "tank" that covers all tracked vehicles, but maybe that's just me.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:54, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

  You can find most of them at lists of armoured fighting vehicles. As far as I can tell, the standard for every other list and article is a title that accurately reflects content, whether “main battle tanks,” “tanks,” “armoured fighting vehicles,” “combat vehicles,” “military vehicles,” or “military equipment.” Examples include:

  • List of main battle tanks by country
  • List of armoured fighting vehicles by country (with a section #Soviet Union)
  • List of combat vehicles of World War I
  • List of interwar armoured fighting vehicles (#Soviet Union)
  • List of military vehicles of World War II (#Soviet Union)
  • List of modern armoured fighting vehicles (#Soviet Union)
  • List of artillery by country (#Russian Empire, Soviet Union and Russian Federation)
  • List of Sd.Kfz. designations (Nazi Germany)
  • Tanks in the Japanese Army
  • List of Polish armoured fighting vehicles
  • United Kingdom:
    • List of FV series military vehicles
    • List of British military equipment of World War II
    • List of tanks of the United Kingdom
  • United States:
    • List of U.S. military vehicles by model number

   —Michael Z. 15:38, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Also for UK and co. British Commonwealth armoured fighting vehicles of World War II GraemeLeggett (talk) 18:25, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Orphaned references in List of tanks of the Soviet Union

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of List of tanks of the Soviet Union's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "B36":

• From T-40: Bishop, p. 36.
• From List of armoured fighting vehicles of Ukraine: Bishop, pp. 36–41

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 16:21, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

 Done —Michael Z. 19:19, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• T-34 light tank.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:12, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Mistake

the list of (post soviet vehicles > self-propelled guns) 2S42 Lotos marked as "Lotus" and link leads to BMD4 195.209.187.240 (talk) 09:52, 9 July 2024 (UTC)