Talk:Livery company/Archives/2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago by EdJohnston in topic Requested move to Livery company


Vintners

The Company of Vintners is listed eleventh in the order of precedence, but the caption under the photo of their hall says they're ninth. Can somebody please determine which is correct. PKT(alk)

Also, the photo is labelled within the article as Vintners' Hall - which is incorrect. It is correctly labelled on the photo page itself as Vintners' Place. Vintners' Hall is on Upper Thames Street, so directly to the north of Vintners' Place, and therefore entirely concealed in the photo. Does anyone have a photo of Vintners' Hall? CharlesSpencer (talk) 09:22, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Requested move to Livery company

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved. It seems this is not very controversial, since nobody but the proponent has expressed an opinion. EdJohnston (talk) 15:08, 26 March 2014 (UTC)


Livery CompanyLivery company – Per WP:NCCAPS. Does not appear to be a proper name. Ibadibam (talk) 22:08, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Opening a technical request as a regular move discussion. EdJohnston (talk) 22:31, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.