Talk:Logan Lake

(Redirected from Talk:Logan Lake, British Columbia)
Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Highland Valley Copper Mine

edit

This needs its own article; I can provide stunning orbital shots from NASA/JPL that show the scar of the mine; at first I thought it was an oblong cloud then I realized it was in all the images.....another mine in the same general to note needing an artice Giant Mascot Mine.....like so many others....Skookum1 (talk) 03:31, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Former company town?

edit

IIRC this was originaly a company town, only later incorporatred, as with Tumbler Ridge and a few others. It's not a company town any longer, so like Kimberley and Trail and Tumbler Ridge it falls in a grey area - incorporated, but really a company town. Not sure what to cat this as; maybe there sholud be Category:Former company towns in Canada??Skookum1 (talk) 03:31, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply


Requested move

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Logan Lake, British ColumbiaLogan Lake – Name is unique as town name, no secondary uses exist other than the eponymous lake which is only notable as being the origin of this municipality's name, target is redirect to current title. Canadian disambiguation rules per CANSTYLE say unique town/city names take no disambiguation Skookum1 (talk) 04:06, 19 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

  • Oppose Neutral There is Lake Logan, New Zealand. Disambiguation seems appropriate.--Labattblueboy (talk) 22:43, 19 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
    • Solvable by a hatnote; and WP:TWODABS proscribes two-item dab pages. And "Logan Lake" and "Lake Logan" are not the same phrase; read WP:UNDAB.Skookum1 (talk) 00:35, 20 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
      • I was gonna say, "oh there's more than two items so reconsider" then I saw "Lake Township, Logan County, Ohio, or "Lake, Logan, Ohio, USA", Lake, West Virginia, or "Lake, Logan, West Virginia, USA" which are, to say the least, a stretch/reach....and who's the 70.xxx.xxx.xxx IP user who's been stalking my contributions these last few days (and did a AfC for this dab page, which despite a two-month backlog there got created within 24 hours??; I smell a MEATPUPPET... "Lake Township, Logan County, Ohio" on a dab for "Logan Lake" is ridiculous...WP:UNDAB I'll refer you to again, but ......Skookum1 (talk) 03:52, 20 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
        • I reject your accusation of "stalking". Your requests show up in a listing called WP:RM, there's no need to stalk you to tell that there are move requests open. As you already know that I hail from Canada, I find it strange that you don't think a Canadian would be interested in Canadian article page moves. I don't see what your problem is with listing "Lake, Logan" values, they have no relation to "Logan, Lake" or "Logan Lake" (only "Lake Logan" would be concerned with "Logan Lake") but they are related to "Lake Logan". If you're familiar with US political subdivisions, county level divisions are between state-level and municipal level. Many US articles are disambiguated by county because there's more than one location in the state with he same name. Not all those articles explicitly spell out "County" in the article naming. I never filed an opinion on this rename request. And if you were familiar with recent US pagemoves, you'd know that the addition and subtraction of "Township" from various US place articles has been happening over the last few months. As for the creation and the AfC backlog, Josve05a (talk · contribs) accepted the AfC request, not Labattblueboy (talk · contribs); I was not expecting it to be accepted in any quick turnaround. It wouldn't have mattered to the destination of this article, since it would not be occupying "Logan Lake" it would be occupying "Lake Logan", a completely different pagename. -- 70.50.151.11 (talk) 05:23, 20 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
I've amended my own position to neutral. I was not aware that Lake Logan, New Zealand was just a redirect, and since there are no other article with even similar names I have no opposition.--Labattblueboy (talk) 06:25, 21 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

See Talk:Haida (or if it is moved, Talk: Haida (disambiguation) where it appears that there was a statement that the puppetry claim made against me was supposed to be withdrawn? -- 70.50.151.11 (talk) 05:08, 27 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Logan Lake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:38, 25 May 2017 (UTC)Reply