Talk:London '66–'67
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the London '66–'67 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
editIs this really an album by or an EP? RedWolf 06:10, Apr 1, 2004 (UTC)
Good question - I think it's an EP. I'll change the page to reflect that. --Auximines 09:13, 1 Apr 2004 (UTC)
why is it called 66 67 if none of it was recorded in 66?
Track listing
editThe cd re-issue does not contain those single tracks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.26.205.1 (talk) 10:01, 23 December 2006 (UTC).
What tracks does it contain then?77.99.98.37 (talk) 17:48, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
Page move
editI have raised concerns about the recent page move for this article on the Pink Floyd WikiProject talk page. --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 20:18, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Merger proposal
editI propose that Nick's Boogie be merged into London '66–'67. I think that the content in the Nick's Boogie article can easily be explained in the context of London '66–'67, and the London '66–'67 article is of a reasonable size in which the merging of Nick's Boogie will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Better this than it simply being deleted. Careful With That Axe, Eugene Hello... 09:50, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
- Support - as proposer, obviously. Careful With That Axe, Eugene Hello... 09:55, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
- Support - I think some of the content of the article belongs here. Better than just deleting it. Cdl obelix (talk) 18:52, 9 February 2011 (UTC)