Talk:London Central Mosque

Vandalism

What's with the vandalism? Would protection even help? It's being reverted pretty quickly... gren グレン 15:58, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Controversy

Seems to be some mainstream media coverage of the 'dispatches' documentaries [1] 92.232.36.159 (talk) 19:09, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Donation of land

quoting from the article "although the land was donated by George VI in return for a site in Cairo for an Anglican cathedral.[2]"

This quotes the source as [[2]]

From that article in the Guardian "1928 ...George VI donates land in return for a site in Cairo for an Anglican cathedral "

...except in 1928 George V was on the throne. George VI didn't have such a title at that date and wasn't next in line to the throne and as such was then a minor royal casting great doubt that he donated the land. Of course it could be just another Grauniad error and they really intended to say George V 78.105.243.103 (talk) 18:37, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Yasmin Alibhai-Brown writes (Exotic England, The Making of a Curious Nation (2015) "the land was paid for by Winston Churchill and his wartime government". She is unclear about when and by which department or person the land donation was actually made. If it was carved out of Regent's Park, the answer surely depends on who legally owned Regent's Park Anyone know?Cloptonson (talk) 10:48, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

References for 1940

I have added your references in the text ... the "report" dated 18 October is from Leo Amery presented to the War Cabinet (not the prime minister, as stated). I don't know how to do the proper references, so if someone could do the honours, I would be obliged. You can lift the text of the report from here if you want ... or use the facsimile ... it is now out of copyright.

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-UxWqn0SpLqI/TfiJSz56oDI/AAAAAAAATgg/0Uekmhch46c/s1600/Mosque.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.22.158.57 (talk) 10:46, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Largest in Europe claim

The claim that this mosque is among the largest in Europe doesn't have a reference attached to it. I've added an {{cn}} tag to it but an editor keeps removing it. As they don't seem to understand that claims like this need a source, anyone got a good source for this claim? Ravensfire (talk) 20:39, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

No source provided for past two months. This is an extraordinary claim and with it unsourced and unsupported in the article it's simply WP:PUFFERY. This needs to be sourced to a solid, independent reliable source. Ravensfire (talk) 18:21, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on London Central Mosque. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090113205921/http://www.muslimdirectory.co.uk/viewdetails.php?id=5207&zip=nw8&orgtype= to http://www.muslimdirectory.co.uk/viewdetails.php?id=5207&zip=nw8&orgtype=

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:20, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on London Central Mosque. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120323162520/http://twocircles.in/2010sep08/crescent_obscured_indian_muslims_britain.html to http://twocircles.in/2010sep08/crescent_obscured_indian_muslims_britain.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:55, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Azam jah.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:37, 20 July 2020 (UTC)