Talk:Lord of Misrule
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
[Untitled]
editI'm not sure, is it ok to quote from "The Golden Bough", seeing as its out of print and I have provided a link to an online version? - Egoinos
The article becomes confusing with the paragraph that begins with 'Hopefully.' I am not sure what is quoted and from where. I don't know the source so I do not feel comfortable fixing it. Mr.Badlands 02:42, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
- It's fine to quote Frazer's speculations in an online version, if he really needs to be cited at all in this connection. Surely a more recent historian has evaluated his work on the subject? I'll see what else I can find in the way of sources and if I can't, please consider this message retracted. Haploidavey (talk) 21:03, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lord of Misrule. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/asterius_00_eintro.html - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040619110859/http://earlychristianwritings.com/fathers/asterius_04_sermon4.htm to http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/fathers/asterius_04_sermon4.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:48, 5 December 2017 (UTC)