Talk:L.A. Live

(Redirected from Talk:Los Angeles Sports and Entertainment District)
Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Should Nokia Theatre have its own page?

edit

The Nokia Theatre is a very important venue in LA, despite only being open for a few years. Other venues such as the Kodak Theatre has its own wiki page. How does everyone else feel about possibly making a page for the nokia theatre? --MusicGeek101 (talk) 04:36, 10 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Justin Beiber

edit

It was mentioned that a this was a stop on Justin Beiber's tour under the Nokia Theater section. I removed this as this theater is a common stop on many music artist's tours, and holds little relevance. 98.182.30.97 (talk) 21:50, 10 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Times Square of the West

edit

This term is also not popularly used anymore. Although it was refered to this in the beginning, it is rarley called that anymore. I propose removing the reference to "popularly called Times Square of the West". —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tornados28 (talkcontribs) 22:13, 14 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

I agree that as a name, it isn't really called this anymore, however the reference to New York's Times Square is still often made. Maybe we can mention this in the opening paragraph, but take out the "popularly called Times Square West" part. Stevemarks 01:49, 19 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

The term has definitely fallen out of use. Djgranados 09:49, 21 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Technically not a civic center

edit

This development esentially contains no government public buildings as is defined in the Wikipedia entry for Civic Center. This is a public entertainment area and not a government type civic center. Especially due to the fact the government district of downtown Los Angeles is called the civic center. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tornados28 (talkcontribs) 22:11, 14 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Rename to LA Live

edit

I propose this article be renamed to L.A. Live since that is the name this project is almost universally recognized as. Stevemarks 02:49, 30 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

I agree (Viewport 15:53, 30 May 2007 (UTC))Reply

The Island

edit

The article refers to The Island but this just points to a diambiguation page. What island? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeremymiles (talkcontribs) 00:37, 10 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

I think it's referring to the 2005 movie. But if that's the case, that whole paragraph doesn't seem very factual. (Viewport 19:01, 26 February 2007 (UTC))Reply

Untitled

edit

This is Going to Be the Greatest Thing To ever happened to downtown LA, I see a Great Light In its future!!!! -Red- fr: Los Angeles — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.138.135.119 (talkcontribs) 21:07, 6 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

update

edit

There is a ton of new updated information available. will be adding some soon. Djgranados 10:06, 21 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject class rating

edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 03:23, 9 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

There should be disambiguation assistance regarding:

Thank You,

[[ hopiakuta Please do sign your signature on your message. ~~ Thank You. -]] 22:00, 18 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

I do not entirely agree.

[[ hopiakuta Please do sign your signature on your message. ~~ Thank You. -]] 05:55, 25 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Problems

edit

I put up the Articleissues template to note that:

1) The article needs more inline citations to support stated "facts."
2) Because are no inline citations, it raises the question of whether or not original research is included in the article, which violates Wikipedia policies.
3) The article has a couple of issues with Wikipedia's policy on neutral point of view. These are indicated in the article.
4) It generally reads like an advertisement, something you might read in a marketing brochure or maybe a press release. As such, it raises the possibility that someone connected with the project, either directly or indirectly, has edited this article. -- Gmatsuda (talk) 04:09, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

BTW: This is an attempt to help improve the article, not attack people who edited it. -- Gmatsuda (talk) 04:14, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I had some time, so I did a little clean-up...fixed a few things...added citations...didn't add anything new, just some fixes. -- Gmatsuda (talk) 23:43, 8 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Criticisms?

edit

This article is entirely lacking of criticism of which there are many. For starters, the design of LA Live was widely disparaged, especially by the LA Times:

[1]

Secondly, although the place was designed as a "West Coast Times Square" and as a downtown gathering place, it has largely failed on both fronts being used mostly for pre-game and pre-concert activities. At any given time during the week, it's a relative ghost town. Even the Ritz Carleton Residences, which were highly publicized as being a game-changer for downtown are largely a failure and at one point it was discovered that many people tied to AEG had purchased there to boost the image that they were selling quickly. At one point, a Chinese telemarketing firm was operating out of them but was shut down by police.

Thirdly, there was somewhat of a scandal during construction in that the LA City Council permitted billboards which would be illegal elsewhere prompting accusations of high-level bribery.

[2]

As someone mentioned above, this does seem more like an ad than a proper article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.48.1.197 (talk) 15:37, 18 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

References

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on L.A. Live. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:46, 9 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on L.A. Live. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:20, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply