Talk:Louis XVIII/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 11:59, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 11:59, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Initial comments

I've done a quick initial read through and the article appears to be at or about GA-standard, as it is well referenced and illustrated; that said, the [[WP:Lead] needs cleaning up as it is currently confusing.

I will now do a more detailed review, section by section, but leaving the Lead until last. That this point I will mostly be concentrating on "problems". So if a section is not mentioned, its probably OK; but I will provide an overall summary at the end. Pyrotec (talk) 22:25, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

• Early life -

• Looks OK. Pyrotec (talk) 22:46, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

• At his brother's court & Exile -

• These two sections look OK. Pyrotec (talk) 21:21, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

overalll summary

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

A comprehensive, well referenced article.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   Well referenced

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   Well illustrated

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Congratulations on the qaulity of the article. I'm award it GA-status. Pyrotec (talk) 16:27, 19 February 2010 (UTC)