Talk:Lubiprostone

Pharmacology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Lubiprostone.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

There is a wrong structure in the article of lubiprostone.

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

There should be only 5 carbons at the side chain of 1,1-difluoropentyl. And the formula of lubiprostone only 20 carbons, but the structure shows 21 carbons. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.78.179.120 (talk) 15:24, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

The current structure is correct. ChemNerd (talk) 20:34, 13 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Indications

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

why have we no mention of the fact that, according to the official website, the drug is approved only for use in women? Toyokuni3 (talk) 15:58, 1 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Lubiprostone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071216000140/http://clinicalpharmacology.com:80/default.asp? to http://www.clinicalpharmacology.com/default.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:45, 20 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

=absorption

this should be absorption not metabolism: "Data indicate that metabolism occurs locally in the stomach and jejunum." Most oral drugs are absorbed in the jejunum.

Add topic