Talk:Tropang LOL
(Redirected from Talk:Lunch Out Loud)
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Iffy in topic Requested move 15 July 2022
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 2 May 2022. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tropang LOL article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
deletion of Lunch Out Loud page
editwhy do the Lunch Out Loud page is scheduled for deletion? 180.195.195.174 (talk) 03:12, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Requested move 15 July 2022
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) Iffy★Chat -- 14:33, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Lunch Out Loud → Tropang LOL – Show will be Tropang LOL on July 16, 2021 Goodvibes500 (talk) 09:24, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request (permalink). Goodvibes500 (talk) 12:24, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Not yet shown to be the WP:COMMONNAME. -Kj cheetham (talk) 13:10, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
Um can we change lunch out loud into tropang lol now Ydor Mangaba Toberos (talk) 03:16, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Support: As the show is now renamed, it should definitely going to be changed to "Tropang LOL". VictorTorres2002 (talk) 09:59, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Strong support. Most sources said that upon Lunch Out Loud's move to an earlier timeslot, it will change to "Tropang LOL", so although Kj said this article's name change does not fit within WP:COMMONNAME which it said yesterday, it appears to be a recent case of WP:NAMECHANGE (Sometimes the subject of an article will undergo a change of name. When this occurs, we give extra weight to independent, reliable English-language sources ("reliable sources") written after the name change. If the reliable sources written after the change is announced routinely use the new name, Wikipedia should follow suit and change relevant titles to match. If, on the other hand, reliable sources written after the name change is announced continue to use the established name, Wikipedia should continue to do so as well, as described above in "Use commonly recognizable names"). That's why this article's name should be changed [at this time]. ----Rdp060707|talk 14:43, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Support per Rdp060707 as WP:NAMECHANGES. Originally suppose to vote an "oppose" as per the nominator's non-validable reason, but since with a few sources found containing its rename, I might as well to have the same vote as above. Also Goodvibes500, there's a option to directly move a page via H:MOVE or just simply read and understand about WP:MOVE as you've probably make it hard and difficult on yourself by requesting a page move either through WP:RM or WP:RM/T. CruzRamiss2002 (talk) 11:42, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.