Talk:M-85 (Michigan highway)/GA1
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Dough4872 in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Dough4872 (talk · contribs) 03:26, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- Can you move the traffic counts and NHS information to the end of the route description?
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Can you mention where M-85 was truncated to in the lead?
- Can you mention what part of M-3 along Fort Street became M-85?
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- An image of the road would be nice, but not required.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
I will put the article on hold for a few minor fixes. Dough4872 03:26, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
- All done. Imzadi 1979 → 03:31, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
- I will now pass the article. Dough4872 03:32, 15 January 2012 (UTC)