Talk:Diospyros discolor

sp. discolor not accepted

ITIS does not accept the species name Diospyros discolor. The accepted name is Diospyros blancoi [[1]] . Is there any reason why this binomial should not be changed? NaySay 15:48, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

In this case it's correct, but it is never a good idea to rely on ITIS, which is priobably the worst and most outdated of all major taxonomic databases. I usually check GRIN, and if that doesn't work, it's a manual Google search. Google Scholar is also not reliable for plants, because many non-botanists are very slow to adapt name changes. Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 15:35, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Some useful sites for this article (I also gave these sites for the Kamagong article):

http://www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/morton/mabolo.html (has a story why it is called blancoi)

http://www.worldagroforestrycentre.org/Sea/Products/AFDbases/AF/asp/SpeciesInfo.asp?SpID=18079

Maybe I'll get around doing it next week. Also, I think the description of the fruit's aroma as smelling like cat's feces is a little biased. I've had it and I agree with most articles that it smells a bit like rotten cheese. (with hints of jackfruit, peach, apple, ... but that's just me)

Responsiblebum 07:59, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Merge with Kamagong?

I think this article should be merged with the Kamagong article. I mean, we don't have an apple and a separate apple tree article do we?

Responsiblebum 08:02, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Merge: I agree that we should merge both articles. I believe Kamagong is the name of the hardwood taken from the Mabolo tree. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.202.47.196 (talk) 10:16, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Done. ClaretAsh 11:07, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and carefull attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 20:22, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Talk page merge

The following notes have been copied from Talk:Kamagong as, the articles having been merged, they'll be more likely to be noticed here than there. ClaretAsh 11:16, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Scientific names

Anyone who'd like to work on this further might find these possible scientific names helpful:

• Diospyros ebenaster
• Diospyros inclusa
• Diospyros melanoxylon
• Diospyros mindanaensis
• Diospyros pyrrhocarpa

from http://www.toolcenter.com/wood/cnames_k.html

• Diospyrus philippinensis

from http://calabarzon.denr.gov.ph/real/PAsite/palaypalay.htm

• Diospyros blancoi A DC.

from http://www.pawb.gov.ph/uploaded_files/Documents/daoplants(asofnov22,2005)-DEC-2.doc

Not sure where the Mabolo (Diospyros discolor) fits in...

--Snori 00:02, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Links

Here are some sites with info on the tree. I'm feeling a little lazy. Maybe I'll do it next week.

• http://www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/morton/mabolo.html
• http://www.worldagroforestrycentre.org/Sea/Products/AFDbases/AF/asp/SpeciesInfo.asp?SpID=18079

--Responsiblebum 07:44, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Diospyros discolor which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 10:05, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

https://www.gbif.org/species/3032976 and https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:322146-1 Call the current name a synonym of Diospyros discolor Willd.Hardyplants (talk) 03:00, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

I have been told by e-mail that PoWO will be updated to Diospyros blancoi. Diospyros discolor is definitely wrong; it was the subject of a conservation proposal, but this failed, which various sources apparently didn't notice. Peter coxhead (talk) 11:32, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Ok, thanks, I am sure it take time to update a hug data set.Hardyplants (talk) 13:20, 28 January 2022 (UTC)