Talk:Majestic-class battleship/GA1

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Parsecboy in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 15:11, 30 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

I'll get to this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:11, 30 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Sturmvogel 66: - any progress on this? Parsecboy (talk) 17:44, 20 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
Maybe before the end of the month, but no promises. Locked in a heated battle in the WP:Stub Contest--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:49, 20 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
Fair enough - good luck getting that voucher ;) Parsecboy (talk) 19:04, 20 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Dude just tripled my entire month's work and I'm just about out of ship stubs to do in bulk, so here I am.

  • no DABs, external link good.
  • Photos appropriately licensed.
  • Usual sort of infobox stuff. Add power line w/ boilers and ihp, link VTE steam engines, simplify torpedo description. Since the guns are linked probably don't need caliber length provided that that info is in the armament para.
    • Should all be fixed now.
  • I know what you're trying to say here Japanese Shikishima and Mikasa classes, but it's a bit problematic since Mikasa was a singleton.
  • Be consisted about abbreviating measurements in the main body, right now I see 12 in and 12-inch.
    • Should all be standardized now
  • Some kind soul has added a link for naval citadel [[Citadel#Naval term|citadel]] that you should add and remember for later. And same for [[ship motions|roll]]
    • That's pretty handy.
  • Move link to conning tower to first appearance
    • Done
  • Add links for freeboard, caliber length and or note for /40 nomenclature, QF.
    • All done.
  • Watch for rounding errors in measurements. 18 inches is the only one I've noticed so far, though.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:56, 28 August 2015 (UTC)Reply