Talk:Mammy stereotype
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 August 2021 and 9 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Dmg31500, Lkm4gn, Ope Adekunle16. Peer reviewers: Krs4d3, ChloeR2000, LHK428.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:28, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 13 January 2021 and 23 April 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jnarnold2, Hcking1.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Untitled
editI would dispute the comment that 'Mammy' the song was racial; Jolie as an immigrant Jew was far more in sympathy with immigrants including those of African descent, than most Americans. Whilst not a true 'jazz' artist, he was instrumental in advancing its popularity. W Betteley becker.1933@ntlworld.com
This is a very rich subject -- certainly as rich as blackface. The article needs a lot of work! deeceevoice 14:38, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
I am going to take the first link out since it is no longer working. spikelee
"Mammy" is also what most Irish children call their mothers. Jdorney 11:25, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Would a "mammy" really have been a wet nurse? To white children in the southern U.S.? I think some clarification is needed. 70.20.238.31 18:42, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
This is the most racsist thing on this website
Tom & Jerry
editThe article is currently very weasely with regard to the housekeeper on the Tom & Jerry cartoons (calling her "reminiscent of the mammy archetype"). Please. She is the archetype, in full form, for generations of children to see up to and including my own. This needs a cite one way or the other, but I find the weasely language quite annoying in this case. — BrianSmithson 22:37, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- This language has been changed. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 17:41, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
Chrono Cross Refrence
editIt looks to me that the character in Chrono Cross looks more like she's from Hawaii than a "mammy archetype". Considering the flower in her hair and the blue eyes, I think that's what they were going for, so I think it's inappropriate to give her as an example.
- I agree, I think it's a stretch 198.6.46.11 13:47, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
- This reference has been removed. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 17:43, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
Racist?
editCan someone add to the article *why* this is a racial slur. For people not familiar with the full context, it's far from clear. If it was a fat white woman, it surely would not be seen as racist
Wait, are you referring to the article or the Mammy archetype?
Joking aside, this one is a delightful edge case. There are so many admirable qualities associated with a mammy, it's hard to separate the subservient role of a mammy to 1800's southern white plantation owners. I say, take the whole package. Be outraged if you want, but acknowledging the inherent wisdom and strength of a mammy also acknowledges equality of the races in a manner of thought.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.31.166.240 (talk) 10:18, August 27, 2007 (UTC)
- If the article in 2007 was lacking the reason for the term being considered racist, by this time it seems to have been well explained. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 17:45, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
Gone With the Wind?
editShould "Gone with the Wind" be mentioned seeing as it had a "mammy" as an important character. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thesniperremix (talk • contribs) 01:32, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
- This movie is now mentioned in at least three places. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 17:47, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
This article needs to be seriously cleaned up
editIf you read this article from beginning to end, all you get is a series of undergraduate crit-lit condemnations that often contradict one another and shed no insight or historical perspective on the subject. First she is masculine and a threat to white people, and then she is docile and feminine and an exaggeration of the female physique aimed at making white people feel safe. What white people? Slave owners? Children of Slave owners? 20th century Americans? This article is just a jumbled mess. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.67.123.206 (talk) 18:57, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
- what is an accurate source of this? 85.195.138.227 (talk) 08:00, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
File:1941hattie.jpg Nominated for Deletion
editAn image used in this article, File:1941hattie.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests September 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:57, 29 September 2011 (UTC) |
Ethnic slur
editThis article is very american centric with the mention of mammy not being used and being considered racist. In northern England it is used regularly in an endearing way towards (usually your own) mothers. I would add to it by my current form of Internet access doesn't lend itself well to long-form typing Silent1 12:42, 15 August 2013 (UTC) Silent1 12:42, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
- The mammy archetype is an american idea, which is inherently racist, and is used only in reference to african americans. The term "mammy" may be used by many, many people with absolutely no racist overtones whatsoever, esp. if its within a family. however, in the us, to use the word publicly is nearly as bad as "nigger". I dont think even african americans use the word to describe their own mothers (though i bet the word was used a lot about a century ago). I think a note in the article to clarify that the term may not be racist everywhere. however, since the caricatures from us culture of blacks have spread worldwide, i dont think anyone can be deaf to its usage any more. And im sorry that certain words end up getting destroyed by racists. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:52, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
- In accordance with the above comments, I changed the title (moved the article) from "Mammy archetype" to "Mammy archetype in the United States." BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 17:56, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
- Until an article such as Mammy (term of endearment) is created, the title Mammy archetype (or Mammy stereotype) is unambiguous. Hillbilly is another quintessentially American trope: we don't need to name the article Hillbilly stereotype in the United States just because other uses of the term exist. –Sangdeboeuf (talk) 22:55, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
- In accordance with the above comments, I changed the title (moved the article) from "Mammy archetype" to "Mammy archetype in the United States." BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 17:56, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
Other countries?
editI remember similar characters in French, Spanish and Portuguese language TV productions about slavery, especially Januária from "Escrava Isaura". However I have no idea if the archetype exist in other countries (I only know about Tia Nastácia in Brasil) or was it just influenced by the movies like Gone with the wind. Do you think it should be mentioned here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.77.52.172 (talk) 02:53, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
- Which TV show in French? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:E35:8A8D:FE80:1DF3:2DC0:CB36:CD53 (talk) 17:14, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
Historicity
edit"The historicity of the mammy figure is questionable", eh? And no one sees any contradiction between this statement and the leading photograph of Mauma Mollie, with the testimony of the family member? — Paul Magnussen (talk) 23:29, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
- Well, I guess User:Paul Magnussen saw a contradiction. Anybody can edit in Wikipedia, so I suppose the user could have done so. Thanks. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 00:06, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- To answer this old question: the source cited points out that the testimony of the family members that kept Mauma Mollie in slavery does not reflect the experience of Mollie herself. The family member quoted can't even remember the year that Mollie was buried. — Toughpigs (talk) 17:26, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Requested move 13 March 2018
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the pages at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 23:10, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
– Since Wikipedia is not a dictionary, this is the clear primary topic for "Mammy". All other uses of the term are based on the archetype. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 08:10, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose As far as I know, the term has little significance (in terms of what is covered in the article) outside the US and pageviews do not support primacy. Shadow007 (talk) 08:35, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what bearing usage outside the US has on this discussion, since all the entries on the disambiguation are from the US and are based on the stereotype. It's about long term significance, not pageviews. Also, the graph clearly shows mammy archetype getting the majority of views by a long shot, so I'm not sure what you mean by not supporting primacy.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 08:37, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
- Primary is determined by usage and long term significance. I do not see how you can say it is getting "the majority of views by a long shot". Graph does not show that at all. Shadow007 (talk) 08:52, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
- For the vast majority of the time ever since 2015 it has consistently gotten roughly double that of the next most popular article. Beyond that, every other article is negligible in views compared to it. That to me is clear primacy, especially since said next most popular article, Mammy Two Shoes, is an example of the Mammy stereotype as described in this article.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 08:57, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
- Primary is determined by usage and long term significance. I do not see how you can say it is getting "the majority of views by a long shot". Graph does not show that at all. Shadow007 (talk) 08:52, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what bearing usage outside the US has on this discussion, since all the entries on the disambiguation are from the US and are based on the stereotype. It's about long term significance, not pageviews. Also, the graph clearly shows mammy archetype getting the majority of views by a long shot, so I'm not sure what you mean by not supporting primacy.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 08:37, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose no suggestion that this so article is encyclopaedically significant the ambiguating the title would help readers. In ictu oculi (talk) 15:51, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose. The present title of this page is very clear. Renaming this page Mammy would make the subject of this article unclear.-- Toddy1 (talk) 19:38, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose. No primary topic here. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:01, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Remember to check the sources
editSeveral times recently editors have made changes to the content without apparently first checking the source given for the content, so I reverted back to an earlier version. If your edit makes a difference in meaning of the content, be sure to cite a new source for the change. Thank you. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 05:05, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Uncited material in need of citations
editI am moving the following uncited material here until it can be properly supported with inline citations of reliable, secondary sources, per WP:V, WP:CS, WP:IRS, WP:PSTS, WP:BLP, WP:NOR, et al. This diff shows where it was in the article. Nightscream (talk) 14:44, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
|
Wiki Education assignment: Black Women and Popular Culture
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2022 and 1 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mayabubbles321 (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Mayabubbles321 (talk) 22:40, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: This is America
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 January 2023 and 15 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Scsaker13 (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Scsaker13 (talk) 19:21, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Citation errors
editThat's not really how to use footnote numbers! 213.57.58.48 (talk) 12:44, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Picture Caption.
editRequested by Adflatuss It is my view, that the caption should describe the Mammy stereotype the picture represents. Direct adversarial language takes the picture out of the historical context and prevents the reader from seeing how the stereotype could have emerged. A Tree In A Box (talk) 03:55, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: WGS-200
editThis article is currently the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 August 2024 and 16 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Aixmar (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Aixmar (talk) 15:56, 28 October 2024 (UTC)