Talk:Cochemiea dioica

(Redirected from Talk:Mammillaria dioica)
Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Why are we deleting a redirect?? If someone wants to find Mammillaria dioica, isn't it better to go to the genus than find nothing? Vultur 14:27, 31 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Well, it is ciclic redirect. if you clic on Mammillaria dioca in Mammillaria you are redirected back to Mammillaria. If someone is looking for this species and dont find it in here he/she can go to find more data elswere (via google). But I think people are not so stupid (if they are using this scientific name) to type in just order name: Mammillaria. It is not a good idea to make 171 redirect to Mammillaria from all those 171 taxa of this order.--Juan de Vojníkov 15:25, 31 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mammillaria dioica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:46, 14 January 2018 (UTC)Reply