Talk:Perpernia gens

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Page title

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

In Broughton's MMR under 69 BC there is a Vestal called Perpennia, so perhaps this page's title should be Perpernia gens, with an extra 'i'. Avilich (talk) 14:11, 2 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Most likely, but I haven't had time to research it yet. P Aculeius (talk) 15:25, 2 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Follow-up: sorry I forgot about this, but you're quite correct. Corrected and moved accordingly. I think we may assume for now that this is how Etruscan nomina ending in -na are treated in the feminine—as though they were regular first/second declension names—at least until we see evidence to the contrary. P Aculeius (talk) 22:20, 7 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic