Talk:Matthew Wright (presenter)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Matthew Wright (presenter) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AfD
editOn June 1 2005 this page was nominated for deletion. The result of the debate was to redirect. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Matthew Wright for discussion. Mackensen (talk) 16:50, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Re: Bicycle arrest
editIs the bicycle arrest section real or just spam? If its real, can we have a source for this section? Andy4226uk 09:09, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- It is indeed very realRepublicUK 04:08, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Pointless Trivia
editIt doesn't matter if there is a reference - it simply isn't relevant if an album changed his life or what bands he likes! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ohnoudidntttt (talk • contribs) 14:34, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
- Disagree, Wright makes a big deal about music, is a Hawkwind obsessive/anorak and frequently mentions them in completely unrelated topics, is also the regular host of the hippy-oriented prog-rock awards every year. Have restored. Rodericksilly (talk) 02:01, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
this needs to be rewritten properly or deleted
edit"One of Wright’s penchant on the show was to be regularly taken in by prank callers. One example is of a former gentleman partner of Sharon Goodman, who has on multiple occasions called into the show to voice his displeasure over the seemingly tumultuous nature of their uncoupling. Instead of professionally brushing off the interruption's and continuing with the show, Wrights tendacy to throw a hissy fit often brought the calls to wider attention and added unintentional additional humour to the situation."
I think it's survived closer scrutiny because it has a 'proper' citation, a link to a bbc piece. but it's appallingly written & salacious, & while I'm no fan of wright myself, I don't think this belongs in a wp article about him.