Talk:Maybe I'm Amazed

Need MP3

It would be good to have an external link to a wav or mp3 - Kittybrewster 07:39, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

---Hey! you need the header thingie, like so:

==Need MP3==

type about how you want an MP3 of this song on here, and I be like

"Hey, that's kinda illegal."

And you be like, "I just want a clip of the song, a-hole"

and I be like, "You're mean" and I go off crying.

ComposerWannabe 10:43, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

revisions/additions needed

Can the cover songs be put into some kind of logical order (alphabetical or chronological)? What about the studios and recording session dates for the studio versions? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.56.242.2 (talk) 22:36, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

yes, i would support that. it is a bit confusing. and by the way, th

Oliver Jung-Kostick (talk) 17:07, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Infobox - Studio or live version?

The infobox is a little confused at the minute - most of the details (release date, where recorded etc) refer to the original song (which was only an album track) but it does describe it as a 'Single by Paul McCartney' which it never was and has the cover and b-side of the live version (and is in the chronology in the correct place for the live single). The article as a whole is about the song rather than the live single but shouldn't the infobox only have the details of the single?Retro junkie (talk) 00:07, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:McCartney1970albumcover.jpg

The image Image:McCartney1970albumcover.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --03:59, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Additional citations

Why, what, where, and how does this article need additional citations for verification? Hyacinth (talk) 11:44, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Held back from Abbey Road

There's popular mythology that Paul originally planned to include the track on Abbey Road, but decided to hold it back for release on his first solo album, instead quickly penning "Maxwell's Silver Hammer". Has anyone got a citation on this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.210.110.58 (talk) 20:31, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

It's certainly not true that "Maxwell's Silver Hammer" was a quick replacement for "Maybe I'm Amazed", as it was written first, in October 1968, and was a song that McCartney was determined to put out on a Beatles record (ideally as a single). Tony Keen2 (talk) 20:36, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Recording date

When was Maybe I'm Amazed recorded? AmericanLeMans (talk) 14:37, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Maybe I'm Amazed. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090306073135/http://www.paulmccartney.com/news.php to http://www.paulmccartney.com/news.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:47, 6 June 2017 (UTC)