Talk:Mayo Foundation for Medical Education & Research v. United States/GA1

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: SCB '92 (talk contribs count) 18:34, 17 September 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteriaReply


Decent looking article

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    no problems here
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
    no problems here
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    no problems here
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    no problems here
    C. No original research:  
    no problems here
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    no problems here
    B. Focused:  
    no problems here
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
    no problems here
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
    no problems here
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    no problems here
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
    no problems here
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
    excellent article; apart from the one-sentence paragraph used, there's no problem to pass it