Talk:Mega Man & Bass/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: SCB '92 (talk · contribs) 22:10, 25 October 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

It's been up for GAN for over 60 days, so let's review

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   Are you sure it's supposed to read Super Nintendo when it was only released on the Super Famicom in Japan?

    Done — Hibana (talk) 13:05, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   Does Japan, North America and CDs really need to be wikilinked?

    Done — Hibana (talk) 13:05, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   I think the retrieval date format needs to be the same as the publishing date format

    Done — Hibana (talk) 13:05, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   Looks alright

   C. No original research:

   Looks okay

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   Looks fine

   B. Focused:

   Looks good

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   no problems here

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   no issues here

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   Looks nice

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Looks great

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   the retrieval date format is my only major concern; I'm giving you a week, but it shoudln't take long it's a pass