Talk:Metcalf sniper attack
| While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Metcalf sniper attack received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
Categories
editI cannot think of any categories that this fits under. Please add if you think of some.TheWarOfArt (talk) 18:35, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Metcalf sniper attack. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140713111008/http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-07-08/u-s-power-grid-vulnerable-to-attack-congressional-research-service.html to http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-07-08/u-s-power-grid-vulnerable-to-attack-congressional-research-service.html
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140705042615/http://complex.foreignpolicy.com:80/posts/2013/12/24/power-station-military-assault? to http://complex.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2013/12/24/power-station-military-assault
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:22, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
CCTV Footage
editDoes anyone know if this footage is real? It seems to be a many-minute long video of literally nothing. You can't see any damage, any shots being fired, any people, any movement at all as far as I can tell. It seems to add nothing to the article at all. I am voting to remove it. Air♠CombatTalk! 13:53, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
- After watching the video a few more times, I found TWO frames where you can see sparks. It says that there is also a flash(?) of light from a flashlight signalling to begin the attack, but I cannot see that at any point in the video. I propose those two frames be captured and displayed as images. Perhaps we could include a link to the full video and move it to Commons? Air♠CombatTalk! 13:58, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
- I think that sounds good TheWarOfArt (talk) 20:49, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
Not a terror attack
editThe attack was sabotage, not terror. No civilians were directly targeted, they were not spreading terror. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.3.22.102 (talk) 13:26, 19 February 2021 (UTC)