Talk:Michael Baum (surgeon)

Latest comment: 5 years ago by GregorB in topic Over-quotation
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Michael Baum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:36, 27 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Over-quotation

edit

Since Michael Baum is a medical scientist of note, it stands to reason he is critical towards homeopathy, like thousands upon thousands of other scientists, and I don't think the reader needs a 270-word quote that tells us so while not really conveying any useful or interesting message beyond "homeopathy is bogus". It doesn't even belong to "strong criticisms of homeopathy", because he merely says homeopathy is useless rather than fraudulent. I'd throw it out and paraphrase it, perhaps - I'm leaving the decision to other editors. GregorB (talk) 21:39, 23 July 2019 (UTC)Reply