Talk:Michael Wesch
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
What is CASE?
editThe following question was incorrectly on the article. I moved it here. --Teratornis (talk) 09:32, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Dear people of Wikipedia. Please tell us what are the institutions that have named him as the professor of the year 2008. For example, whaw is CASE? (A foreigner, like I, cannot know that.) I like his videos, but where I come from, people will want to know more than e.g. a term "CASE". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.152.83.182 (talk • contribs) 19:51, 12 September 2009
- The Case page is a disambiguation page. It lists some possible meanings of CASE in the Michael Wesch article. Perhaps this is the applicable meaning:
- You could search with Google to see if that term appears with the subject of the article:
- The top result lists Michael Wesch, so that's the correct expansion of the acronym "CASE". I added a link to the article to clarify it. --Teratornis (talk) 09:32, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Unimportant class policy section
editMinor class policies such as Facebook checking are irrelevant to an encyclopedic article of the subject. See WP:ROC. Let's keep this article focused. Soonercary (talk) 10:43, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
Unimportant bio info
editI don't want to get into a revert war with the editor adding all the bio info. Some info is simply irrelevant, and Wesch's "not seeming to mind" is immaterial. Let's keep the article clean and relevant, with only important and encyclopedic information. I'm going to remove extraneous stuff once again to keep the article clean. If you think it needs to be there, explain why below. Soonercary (talk) 07:42, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- So who are you and why are you so persnickety about my Anthropology professor? Do you have some kind of stake invested in this? If the article needed to be cleaner than what I put on earlier, then why does the infobox template even allow for the addition of such information in the first place?
Besides, I think you should put up something about yourself on the userpage so we can find out where you're coming from and what your interests are. Thanks. --70.179.178.5 (talk) 15:43, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
- The info box is a template to be customized to show information relevant to the subject. Reading this will help you. And my interest is good Wikipedia articles. Soonercary (talk) 17:35, 1 December 2010 (UTC)