Wikipedia

Talk:List of acquisitions by Juniper Networks

(Redirected from Talk:Micro Magic Inc.)
Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page
Featured listList of acquisitions by Juniper Networks is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 11, 2009Featured list candidatePromoted

Request edit

edit
Latest comment: 9 years ago7 comments2 people in discussion

I have a COI/financial connection/affiliation with Juniper Networks. I'd like to request a couple minor edits to this page:

  • Can we add a couple acquisitions that are missing from the table? I've put them in the table's format below.
Acquisition date Company Business Country Value (USD) References
December 2012 Contrail Systems, Santa Clara, CA.
Founded: 2012 		Software-defined network controllers   United States US$176 million [1]
February 21, 2011 Brilliant Telecommunications, Campbell, CA
Founded: 2004 		Synchronization technology   United States US$4.5 million [2]
  • I'd like to suggest using the date an acquisition was completed, as oppose to when it was announced, which would result in the following date changes:
  • Redline Networks: April 26, 2005 -> May 2, 2005[1]
  • Kagoor Networks: March 29, 2005 -> May 2, 2005[2]
  • Peribit Networks: April 26, 2005 -> July 6, 2005[3]
  • Blackwave Networks: October 28, 2010 -> November 8, 2010[4] (this one is a correction based on the source already used)
  • I could not find any publicly available sources about the Nexsi acquisition mentioned in paragraph 2; it's not included in their press release archives or annual report and there are no media reports or other sources on it. I asked Juniper (Original Research) and they verified the company acquired intellectual property from Nexsi through a bankruptcy proceeding, but it was not announced publicly and there is no available published information on it. So we have the age-old question of whether to maintain original research that happens to be correct.

CorporateM (Talk) 16:16, 7 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks user:SamWilson989! I'm not sure if it was on purpose, but you created a second Request Edit template with the parameters filled out, rather than filling out the parameters in the original one, which would leave the Request Edit as open/un-answered in the queue. I went ahead and removed the original. CorporateM (Talk) 23:28, 11 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
The second Request Edit template is automatic as I responded with a partial answer template, rather than a full answer template. It's usually done that way so that others can complete the rest of a partial edit. Don't worry though, it doesn't really matter in this case. SamWilson989 (talk) 23:36, 11 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
I've changed the dates to the acquisitions dates for you, and used the Juniper Network sources. They've been used already and are accurate. SamWilson989 (talk) 00:12, 12 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
Cool, thanks. Yes, usually when we have a comprehensive acquisition list like this, primary sources are acceptable, since there are no NPOV or weight issues and most companies reliably report on acquisition dates and volumes. It's always a bit of a curveball however when we have information that happens to be true, but for which no sources exist. Thanks for chiming in! Sometimes it takes months to get a reply on a request edit without bugging someone, so it was surprising to see such a prompt response. CorporateM (Talk) 00:36, 12 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
No worries, I just saw the request pop up as I was looking on the list and it seemed simple enough. Feel free to message me on my talk page again if you have any requests for this page that you cannot edit yourself. SamWilson989 (talk) 00:48, 12 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ Duffy, Jim (December 12, 2012). "Juniper buys SDN startup for $176M". Network World. Retrieved December 22, 2014.
  2. ^ Donegan, Michelle (February 21, 2011). "Juniper Outbids Rival in M&A Swoop". Light Reading. Retrieved December 24, 2014.

Lead

edit
Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Suggest replacing the second paragraph of the Lead, which relies heavily on primary sources, with the summary located at Juniper_Networks#Acquisitions_and_investments, which relies on secondary sources and would be more in-line with WP:Summary style. CorporateM (Talk) 20:23, 27 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Sorry no one responded to the request. It looks a good replacement to me so I've done the edit. 09:00, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Thanks @Dmcq:! I trimmed the original research, primary sources, excess detail, etc. in the Lead that I intended for the well-sourced summary to replace. If that doesn't look ok, please let me know and I'll revert myself pronto! CorporateM (Talk) 15:34, 27 June 2015 (UTC)Reply
Seems fine, the main article gives that sort of detail. Dmcq (talk) 00:18, 28 June 2015 (UTC)Reply
edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of acquisitions by Juniper Networks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:18, 19 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of acquisitions by Juniper Networks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:25, 24 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_acquisitions_by_Juniper_Networks&oldid=1208198286"