Talk:Mike Petersen (soccer)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified (January 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified 2 external links on Mike Petersen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121011105727/http://www.footballaustralia.com.au/2009InsideFFA/default.aspx?s=insideffa_newsfeatures_newsitem_new&id=9617 to http://www.footballaustralia.com.au/2009InsideFFA/default.aspx?s=insideffa_newsfeatures_newsitem_new&id=9617
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091004235425/http://www.smfc.com.au/history/team-of-the-century/hall-of-champions/ to http://www.smfc.com.au/history/team-of-the-century/hall-of-champions/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:33, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Requested move 5 May 2021
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. PRIMARYTOPIC is a bit tougher for these articles, where every subject gets very few pageviews; the previous holder of the base title did happen to get quite a few more average views than his compatriots, but all averaged single-digit daily pageviews, and ultimately no argument could be made that a primary topic exists for this common name. The discussion was quite well-attended, and there's little chance putting it through for another week would have affected the outcome. (closed by non-admin page mover) Vaticidalprophet 10:44, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
– The five-sentence stub for the retired soccer player is not the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. — Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 00:45, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support as per nom. 162 etc. (talk) 01:11, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 02:11, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 09:18, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support per nom, not the PRIMARYTOPIC. GiantSnowman 09:19, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Govvy (talk) 10:58, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Pageviews show that the current topic gets around 67 percent of views of the articles on the dab page. That is the most, and more than the others combined, so...WP:PRIMARYTOPIC by usage. No long-term significance arguments to the contrary. Dohn joe (talk) 01:22, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support per nom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:01, 10 May 2021 (UTC)