Talk:Mexican Armed Forces

Check independent forces

Pleas check sources for independent forces, because the only one existing is the EMP (Estado Mayor Presidencial) which is directly under the orders of the Mexican presidency. No other independent military force exist nowadays in Mexico—Preceding unsigned comment added by Konegistiger (talk • contribs)

What about the federal police and the Grupos Beta?--Rockero 05:58, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

It would be interesting to read about Mexican military families

I would like to know what their lives are like. Are there Mexican military brats?

71.208.200.101 04:17, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Contradict tag

In the "Leadership" subsection of the "Organization" section, these two quotes contradict each other:

"The two components of the Mexican military do not come under a single unified commander at any level below the President, as there is no Minister of Defense."

"This subordination has allowed the Army to use the term “Secretariat of National Defense” (Secretaría de la Defensa Nacional or SEDENA) for its organizational structure, and General Vega García and his predecessors have held the title of Minister of Defense (much to the annoyance of the Navy)."

The Secretary of National Defense is a cabinet-level position, the equivalent of a Minister in some countries. Furthermore, it is unclear who General Vega García is and why he is annoyed.--Rockero 05:58, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Service Pistol?

Anyone know the service pistol for the Mexican armed forces? User:Beanerschnitzel

When I did my service each officer bought their own pistol. Each officer I knew, therefore, had a different type of handgun. I knew of several officers(mainly "Subtenientes")who carried a toy gun due to lack of money, or because they were investing in something else. i.e., alcohol.

That ain't true, the official gun is the berreta92. and each soldier has one, except those who serve to humanity labors. the discilpine is very strict in the barracks, so no one is allowed to leave until sunday.

Service Pistol possibility

I think they use the Beretta 92 user:Homan05

UN PeaceKeeping

There is a mention of Mexico's role in peacekeeping; I placed a "citation needed" template because as far as my research uncovered, Mexico has done some in the past, but for a few decades now has refused to send troops: [1] [2] The passage should be erased or referenced appropiately. BatteryIncluded (talk) 01:28, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Mex Military Equipment

Ive'd erased the equipment section..since theres oready one in the mexican army article and each article for the army..air force and navy has its own equipment list theres no need for one in the Mexican military article. Homan05

Other plans besides Plan DN-III

I am wondering if Mexico even has such things as a Plan DNI and Plan DNII. I have not been able to find any online article to confirm this and some people who are more knowledgeable about Mexican military affairs than I am have pointed out that no such things exist. Does anyone have more information and sources about this issue? Ocelotl10293 (talk) 09:04, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

the plan DNI consist in regular war, im still searching for DNII —Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.235.154.155 (talk) 18:53, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Plan DN-II refers to civil war Mistah B (talk) 16:41, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

US Foreign Military

The article states that Mexico's help during Hurrican Katrina was the first time a foreign military force had been allowed on US soil. I know this is bull because during my time with the British Army we spent alot of time in the States on training exercises before Afghanistan. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamespenny (talk • contribs) 22:10, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

You said it: in training exercises. The Mexican Army entered the country in an actual operation. Titoxd^{(?!? - cool stuff)} 10:05, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

It's still nonsense, because the 23th Canadian Infantry Brigade landed in the Aleutians in 1943 to help liberate the place from the Japanese. In order for this to make sense, you would have to include all kinds of caveats - "continental United States", for example, or start nit-picking the type of operation. In the end, it's a trivial point. Foreign soldiers have served in the U.S. a lot - particularly noteworthy are the Canadians of the First Special Service Force who trained in Montana, and also saw employment in the Aleutians (though Alaska was not yet technically a state, it was still American soil, being an incorporated territory from 1912). In 1950, the Canadian Army Special Force that went to Korea also passed through the continental United States. As did the Canadian Army Pacific Force in 1945, who trained in the lower 48 in preparation for Operation OLYMPIC, before the A-bombs called it off.

And anyway, it's not like Katrina was an invasion of the Mexican Army.139.48.25.58 (talk) 19:20, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

SMN (national military service)

There is also the option to train serve during three months in one of twelve companies around the country, instead of going everyweekend during one year. (After the minute 55 they can be seen on the parade) Mistah B (talk) 03:46, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

References

Size

This article says that the Mexican armed forces number 280,000 troops. The Mexican Army article says that they have 267,506, the Mexican Navy has 56,000, and the Mexican Air Force has 11,770. The math don't add up. What to do? Coltsfan (talk) 11:44, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mexican Armed Forces. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061116072159/http://multimedia.presidencia.gob.mx/videoflv.php?w=320&h=240&f=presidencia%2Ffox_vicente%2F2006%2F060904_cursos_asp_120.flv to http://multimedia.presidencia.gob.mx/videoflv.php?w=320&h=240&f=presidencia%2Ffox_vicente%2F2006%2F060904_cursos_asp_120.flv

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:10, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Cinderella?

The president, the National Defense Secretariat and the Naval Secretariat all seemed to be changed to ridiculous terms like cinderella and pink power ranger. 2603:8081:A101:75CF:1D3F:3390:C597:DD7F (talk) 19:59, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Misinformation

Non factual add at the beginning of the article. 77.119.201.216 (talk) 14:01, 7 June 2024 (UTC)