Talk:Milkweed Editions
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
awards
editThe two awards sections that take up a big part of the page need third party sources to establish due weight/notability (call it what you will). As of now it's just promotional. --— Rhododendrites talk | 01:09, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
I tend to agree with the above statement. Although I do not find the lists obviously promotional, I cannot find sources to support the importance of these awards sufficiently to warrant the emphasis given them in the article. I don't want to remove them myself, but I would support a consensus if there is one to remove them. Edward Dixon (talk) 15:56, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- I agree too and support removing them. Theroadislong (talk) 15:59, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your quick reply. If I don't hear an opposing view within a few days, I will delete them. Is that a reasonable plan? Edward Dixon (talk) 16:22, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Done as promised. Edward Dixon (talk) 04:03, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Milkweed Editions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20130124105629/http://www.goodthings.com/02_02_milkweed.asp to http://www.goodthings.com/02_02_milkweed.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:18, 31 January 2018 (UTC)