Talk:Millennium '73/GA2
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Ricardiana in topic GA Review
GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I will be reviewing this page shortly. Ricardiana (talk) 02:37, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Whoa. Well, this article has been the subject of a surprising amount of controversy. I'll do my best.
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- Prose quality seems fine.
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- Seems OK.
- B. MoS compliance:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- Very impressive number of sources, from newspapers as well as books and articles. Solid.
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- Article cites sources well for the most part. I suggest adding some more; for example, in the lead it's mentioned that "notable journalists" attended - such as? Just one name would be helpful (preferably to someone who has a page on Wikipedia that could be linked to). Also, it's stated that "the event was later described" as x, y, and z - a citation, or several if necessary, seems called for there.
- C. No original research:
- OK here.
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- Indeed. It's a pretty sweeping article.
- B. Focused:
- Despite the sweep of the article, it seems to be only as broad as needed for purposes of context. Since I don't know anything about the subject, I found the background info on Hans Jayanti, etc., to be very helpful in understanding the topic.
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Seems so to me.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- Despite some bickering over whose edits are helpful, blah blah, the article seems pretty stable and recent battles have been over things like paraphrasing vs. direct quoting - not over content, it seems.
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Yes, two helpful pics are provided.
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass
- Pass or Fail: