Talk:Minas Geraes-class battleship

Note on "Minas Geraes I"

The link to the ship's history as given on the linked reference is wrong; it is actually located here in the .doc format. Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 07:01, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Coal-firing

The statement: "However, unlike Dreadnought, which had turbines, they were powered by reciprocating engines with coal-fired boilers."

Creates the impression that Dreadnought did not have coal-fired boilers, which was not the case.

167.127.24.33 (talk) 16:21, 18 June 2008 (UTC)daniel

Brasseys 1923 diagrams

Great diagrams! Can anyone access the same source to get those for the "Rivadavia" class? So both classes could be better compared. Thanks, DPdH (talk) 10:04, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Wrong Name

The correct name of this Ship should be Minas Gerais, like the brasilian state, and not Minas Geraes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.109.51.78 (talk) 11:09, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

This is explained in the article under footnote 2. Regards, Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 05:59, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Additional source

Hi, just a note for anyone interested, there is an additional source on Sao Paulo here. Thanks, Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 00:32, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Armor specification: conversion to metric system

The armor specification says:

Turrets: 12–9–2/3 in (305–229–51/76 mm)

2/3 in is 16.93 mm. 51/76 mm is 0.671 mm. The problem is that 2/3 in (two-thirds of an inch) can't be converted to metric by converting both the numerator and the denominator: the latter should stay the same (as it is a ratio, not a measurement). 51 mm divided by 3 would give the correct (approx) 17 mm result. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.66.169.157 (talk) 04:43, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi there! The armor specification, as can be read in the Specifications section, is for two-to-three inches, not 2/3 of an inch. I've tried clarifying this in the infobox. Thanks very much, Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 04:59, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Now it is unambiguous; thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.66.169.157 (talk) 05:03, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Minas Geraes-class battleship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101102034637/http://www.revistadehistoria.com.br/v2/home/?go=detalhe&id=1307 to http://www.revistadehistoria.com.br/v2/home/?go=detalhe&id=1307

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:40, 20 May 2017 (UTC)