Good articleMinnesota State Highway 36 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 22, 2024Peer reviewReviewed
May 22, 2024Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 27, 2024.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that there's a little Canada on Minnesota State Highway 36?
Current status: Good article

Interchange with MN 120

edit

While researching future plans for a grade-separated interchange with MN 120, I came across two handouts in one, Washington County is requesting $50 million from the State of Minnesota as part of S.F. 2157 (H.F. 2543 in the House) for the total project. In the other, the county requests only $3 million for planning. I'm unsure how this should be described in the article, and if it should be at all, because aside from those two things, I couldn't find any actual plans. NotDragonius (talk) 02:10, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Update - I have sorted it out to my knowledge. NotDragonius (talk) 01:07, 10 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Minnesota State Highway 36/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: NotDragonius (talk · contribs) 01:12, 10 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: 48JCL (talk · contribs) 20:43, 22 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Happy to review this article!

QuickFail

edit

If PR is not archived in 24 hours as of 20:43 22 May 2024 UTC then I will fail this article.

Source Check

edit

Will spotcheck 13 sources. Using RNG.

[11]  

[3]  

[19]  

[24]  

[8]  

[17]  

[1]  

[22]  

[12]  

[5]  

[6]  

[20]  

[14]   No SPS located

Recommendations

edit

PLEASE use cite web templates or something because basic references is kind of annoying. Note: maps are a bit hard to navigate if used as a source. But I’m not going to fail because of other road GANs.

Overall

edit

1a.   nice work! Well polished

1b.  

2(a,b,c)  

2d.   DAYUM 0.0% PERCENT FROM EARWIG https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Minnesota+State+Highway+36&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=0&turnitin=1

3a.  

3b.   this is an amazing article for a road! Most roads are super short but still get GA status.

4.   read through shows no signs of a biased pov

5.  

6a.  

6b.  

Closing comments

edit

I would recommend merging short paragraphs with eachother in order to have more clarity.@User:NotDragonius congrats on a great road article!

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


@48JCL: are you sure that this is a pass? This seems to use the old style of map citations which there is consensus are original research... For example "The portion of MN 36 south of MN 62 was redesignated as a part of MN 77 in 1980. The former highway between MN 62 and I-35W reverted to county control as CR 152 (Cedar Avenue)." isn't in the source unless one does OR and compares it to other maps. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 15:58, 18 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Rjjiii talk 19:19, 10 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

  • Reviewed:
Improved to Good Article status by NotDragonius (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

NotDragonius (talk) 03:04, 23 May 2024 (UTC).Reply

  •   Reviewing this now. Nice GA~ Recently promoted, no need for QPQ. Earwig turns out fine. The hook is on history section. I duplicated the citation so that the hook is directly cited. Otherwise it's good to go Nyanardsan (talk) 03:24, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ "St. Croix Crossing". Minnesota Department of Transportation. August 2, 2017. Archived from the original on January 18, 2022. Retrieved August 3, 2017.

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:Did you know § Minnesota State Highway 36

edit

  You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Did you know § Minnesota State Highway 36. Rjjiii (talk) 05:39, 19 June 2024 (UTC)Reply