This article ought never have made front page DYK in this state

edit
  • It is full of highly-specialised information, including codes, that no casual reader could possibly have a clue about.
  • It requires the reader to page-hop backwards and forwards for information.
  • It contains very little information that is useful for the casual reader.
  1. What is miniscule?
  2. What is 21.2 cm by 13.8 cm in inches?
  3. What are Ammonian Sections?
  4. What are the Eusebian Canons
  5. What is Byzantine text-type.
  6. What is Category V?
  7. What is the Claremont Profile Method?
  8. What is Kx?
  9. What is textual cluster 17?
  10. Who are F. H. A. Scrivener, C. R. Gregory?
  11. What is INTF?
  12. Who are Ernesto Feron and Fabiano Battaglini?
  13. What is the relevance of minuscule 386 and 878?
  14. What is Ottobonianus gr. 208?

This is not exactly a long article! Why should the reader be expected to look up all this stuff, just to come to some understanding of the significance of this object?

Amandajm (talk) 02:05, 11 September 2012 (UTC)Reply