GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Minute to Win It (U.S. game show)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Bilorv (talk · contribs) 22:14, 20 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Comments

edit

Infobox

edit
  • The image rationale is fine.
  • The executive producers are not cited, or mentioned elsewhere later in the article. Do they need a citation? Same thing with the production company.

Format

edit
  • However, they elect to play the game ... — should this be "However, if they elect ..."?
  • Are the three lives for each challenge, or for the entire game?
  • Fouls? Like what?
  • Illegal moves, etc.   Done
  • I was really surprised at the complete omission of any examples (or even a full list) of challenges. Other than the mention of "common household items" in the lead, there is nothing said about the actual tasks themselves.
  • I understand not every task should be described in detail but couldn't an example, or perhaps a recurring theme in challenges (e.g. balancing objects?) be included? Is there a notable review of the show which comments on the challenges? Other than it being vaguely similar to The Cube, with a time restriction and something about household objects, I have absolutely no idea how the challenges work. — Bilorv (talk)(contribs) 23:12, 20 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • ... other various special editions ... — the word "various" is clunky and redundant; remove it.
  • The bracketed (milestone) doesn't seem to make much sense to me — can it either be integrated into the sentence, or removed?
  • Under Special editions: ... the first team to four points wins $50,000 (milestone) ...
  • Is Supercoin the name of one of the challenges?
  • For clarity, can the word "milestone" (used earlier on) be used in the "Payout structure" section?
  • Did any celebrities worthy of mentioning in the article appear on the show? Did any reviews of the show mention them?

Production

edit
  • How many episodes were in each season?

Merchandise

edit
  • The challenges (e.g. "Bucket Head") have quotation marks, while Supercoin (which I assumed is a game name) mentioned earlier on is in italics. Change all to one format for consistency.

See also

edit
  • The Cube has a description following that doesn't seem necessary (and Beat the Clock, which seems like it would suit an identical description, is listed without an explanation). Just the link suffices.

Lead

edit
  • The program features contestants take part in a series of 60-second challenges that use objects that are commonly available around the house. is a complete redundancy — the only piece of information not mentioned earlier in the paragraph is "60-second", which can be inferred from the title of the show.
  • ... airing the first two episodes back-to-back — this isn't mentioned later on in the article. Either repeat the information under the Production section or remove it from the lead.

Bilorv (talk)(contribs) 22:14, 20 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Minute to Win It (U.S. game show). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:32, 12 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:07, 29 October 2022 (UTC)Reply